Saw III

Started by MacGuffin, March 02, 2006, 09:57:48 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Alexandro

i felt the first one was useless enough. highly moralistic. bad people who do bad things have it coming to them. the shock seems to come from that fact. the fact they had "sins" and are now "paying" for them. serial killers as some sort of penitence for people's sins, even redentors. showy shooting, editing and gimmicks. empty fucking movie whith nothing to say and only horrific if you believe in it's own morals.

matt35mm

I've never seen any of the Saw movies, but from the premise of the first one on, I've gotten the sense that this...

Quote from: Alexandro on January 28, 2007, 06:41:43 PM
highly moralistic. bad people who do bad things have it coming to them. the shock seems to come from that fact. the fact they had "sins" and are now "paying" for them. serial killers as some sort of penitence for people's sins, even redentors. showy shooting, editing and gimmicks. empty fucking movie whith nothing to say and only horrific if you believe in it's own morals.

... is exactly why I would FUCKING HATE IT SO MUCH.

But still not as much as Hard Candy.