oh, i meant capricorn. i have read cancer though. uh, i thought it was good. of course, the way he refered to women and treated them wasn't as amusing as some people think. i thought the book was interesting. capricorn is a little more well thought out. it's still has sexual content, but it doesn't seem to be as harsh. And he does seem to have something he's trying to say in this one.
I heard he later apologized, to some extent, for the way he portrayed women in cancer, so I don't dislike so much anymore for that. was that what you didn't like about the book? or did you just find it to be a big mess, in which case, i could understand that too.