Xixax Film Forum

Film Discussion => The Vault => Topic started by: MacGuffin on March 02, 2006, 09:57:48 PM

Title: Saw III
Post by: MacGuffin on March 02, 2006, 09:57:48 PM
Saw III Due Out Halloween
There will be more blood.

Lionsgate and Twisted Pictures have announced that Saw III is in active development for an October 27, 2006 wide release. Darren Lynn Bousman (Saw II) will direct the horror sequel from a story by Leigh Whannell and James Wan (Saw, Saw II). Whannell also penned the screenplay. Mark Burg and Oren Koules will produce with Whannell and Wan executive producing.

"Yes, there will be more blood," said Lionsgate execs Peter Block and Jason Constantine in a statement. "Saw III will involve the same creative forces responsible for the tremendous success of Saw II. The Twisted team of Mark and Oren, along with Darren, James and Leigh, have all agreed to be prominently involved in Saw III. We are proud to be partnered with some of the most disturbing creative talents on the planet, and the Saw franchise will ensure that gore becomes every bit as much a Halloween staple as ghosts, goblins and candy corn."

"We have been discussing story lines that extend the Saw franchise to new limits and beyond with Lionsgate for the past several months," added Burg and Koules.

"The most important element of any franchise is remaining true to the roots of its success. We believe that we are developing a script that is certain to please the Saw franchise's core fans while adding fresh, terrifying and unimaginable new twists to the Saw saga. Jigsaw himself would be proud."

Saw III will be dedicated to Twisted Pictures principal and Saw producer Gregg Hoffman, who died last fall.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: The Red Vine on March 02, 2006, 10:13:48 PM
they just couldn't leave it alone.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: MacGuffin on March 03, 2006, 12:07:30 AM
Quote from: RedVines on March 02, 2006, 10:13:48 PM
they just couldn't leave it alone.

Not as long as there's still milk in the cash cow.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: MacGuffin on June 28, 2006, 08:52:59 PM
(https://xixax.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fffmedia.ign.com%2Ffilmforce%2Fimage%2Farticle%2F715%2F715400%2FSAW3_Methmouth_JRG_1151531605.jpg&hash=68caa4c53bd8814830a48774dcbecc76408f15be)
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: matt35mm on June 28, 2006, 09:56:18 PM
While they are quite creative with their poster designs, when you compare this with the "controversial" poster for Road to Guantanamo, you can clearly see what half-wits the MPAA is made out of.  It's clear, even to the little children that walk by the poster (which will be much more prominently displayed than the Guantanamo poster, anyway), that this depicts a scene of torture.  It's not really up for interpretation.  And that's a point against a specific reason that the MPAA cited for rejecting the Guantanamo poster.

... anyway... I've never seen a Saw film and don't plan to.  The End.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: pete on June 29, 2006, 12:16:35 AM
how can they work from sawing legs to pulling teeth?  then what's saw 4 gonna be?  plucking brows?
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: matt35mm on June 29, 2006, 01:16:00 AM
Quote from: pete on June 29, 2006, 12:16:35 AM
then what's saw 4 gonna be?  plucking brows?
A detached penis and vagina, or finger and vagina (SAW IV).  No one will understand it, but the MPAA will clear the poster.

You heard it here first, folks.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: Pubrick on June 29, 2006, 06:00:34 AM
Saw V:

(https://xixax.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.swapmeetdave.com%2FHumor%2FWorkshop%2FSawingWoodGraphic.jpg&hash=4a4b4c6becbefdae79fe0703edd574bfb0ba818d)
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: MacGuffin on July 25, 2006, 11:11:47 PM
(https://xixax.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fffmedia.ign.com%2Ffilmforce%2Fimage%2Farticle%2F720%2F720902%2Fsaw-iii-20060725011919757.jpg&hash=bbf4c6592250eccab6600fe4cc8a54ecd58efa7d)
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: NEON MERCURY on July 25, 2006, 11:22:29 PM
hahaha, i love these films....i saw both in theaters...

and i like how they matched the tagline to the poster... :yabbse-thumbup:
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: Derek237 on July 26, 2006, 12:20:15 AM
Compared to all of the shite mainstream horror films out these days (mostly remakes of old flicks that weren't that great to begin with), the Saw films are almost refreshing to see. The second one wasn't as good because it had less puzzle and more bloodlust, and something tells me Saw III is going to take it even further. I mean, it has to. And the posibility of teeth-pulling makes me cringe already.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: Ravi on July 26, 2006, 09:51:40 AM
I like the use of body parts for numbers.  Its all downhill from there.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: MacGuffin on August 08, 2006, 01:12:06 AM
Jigsaw Gets A Girlfriend In 'Saw III,' But Don't Expect Any Love Scenes
Latest installment of horror franchise due October 27.
Source: MTV

SAN DIEGO — Typically, a person who catches a glimpse of a grinning Tobin Bell is about to die.

Now that the filming of "Saw III" is concluded, however, the veteran actor might just be too love-struck to bother sticking heads in a decapitating steel trap.

Recently, a smiling Bell stood alongside series co-star Shawnee Smith and "Saw III" director Darren Lynn Bousman, offering a rare peek at the shockingly heartfelt future of the grisly horror franchise. Thankfully, the man better known as the Jigsaw Killer allowed us to live long enough to talk about it.

"The producers have seen 'Saw III,' or at least a rough cut of it," Bell reported, his famously pale eyes lighting up. "They told me they think it's the best of the films so far. My sense of it, when we were making it a month or so back, was that it would be very strong and very scary, but it also has a great deal of heart to it. Jigsaw's an interesting guy — you never know what you're going to get when you visit with him."

In the latest "Saw" installment, on track for an October 27 release, Jigsaw unveils a whole new batch of surprises for a whole new group of victims — this time, alongside the female apprentice who revealed herself at the end of the last flick. "I wouldn't say I'm super-evil," Smith said, discussing the evolution of Amanda in the third film. "She's struggling, like in any good drama. And I don't know if I would describe them as apprentice and master so much as just like, each other's everything. It's a relationship."

If you're spitting a beverage across the room right now, you are forgiven. Yes, you read that right: The world-loathing homicidal maniac known as Jigsaw is getting himself a girlfriend.

"It's definitely love," Smith giggled. "And horror, and some fun."

"Now you have two diabolical killers instead of one, so you get double your money," grinned Bousman, who also wrote and directed last year's "Saw II." "Shawnee's amazing in this one. She blew me away. She is so scary and so diabolical and so emotional at the same time. You want to hate her, and you want to love her."

"I don't think it really changes his style," Bell said of Jigsaw, who has never seemed like much of a Don Juan. "You jump forward and then back in time with some of the 'Saw' films, so you get to see that Jigsaw has known Amanda for three years. Now you get to see more of their relationship than you had ever known about before."

"It's like 'Romeo and Juliet,' " Smith said of their bond. "It was this love story that developed. Not weird — well, kind of — but like this true love. It's part three of a horror franchise, [but] all this stuff is in there."

"There's an interesting dynamic between the characters, between master and protégé and protégé and victims," Bousman added. "And it is, by far, the most intricately twisty of the 'Saw' films."

With that in mind, Bousman recounted his favorite of the terrifying new tortures that Jigsaw and Amanda dream up. "I can't tell you exactly what happens, but someone is drowning in, let's just say, intestines," the director grinned. "This actor had to actually lie in a vat and basically be covered in intestines and drowning in them. It was really sad because he's an adult male, not a young 20-year-old guy. In some respects it was somewhat hilarious for me, and in other respects I'm going to hell for doing that scene."

Bell's favorite "Saw III" moment is a bit more tender. "There's a scene with Amanda when she comes in to talk to me about something," he said cryptically, perhaps alluding to a doomed love affair. "I have to say goodbye to her, and that was a difficult thing to do. It was, for me, an interesting scene.

"There are a number of scenes in this film where you get to look inside of Jigsaw's soul — not just here, but here," Bell continued, pointing to his head and then his heart. "You get to see what he feels about some of the things that are important to him."

Although Jigsaw's May-December romance may be short-lived, that doesn't mean that fans won't be able to continue their own love affair with the terminally ill terror maestro. "In a lot of ['Saw II'] interviews I said that there would not be a 'Saw III,' " Bousman laughed, revealing that the third installment offers no conclusive resolution that might limit the films to a trilogy. "I don't know how many times they've killed Jason, how many times Freddy Krueger has died in the movies, so I think if this is as successful as we all hope it will be, then I would say 'Saw' will continue on."

"I don't think it wraps it up very neatly," Bell agreed. "It opens up a bunch of doors, and it closes some others. It has a lot of surprises that are pretty intricate and marvelously done. I feel that there's a flower about to blossom."

With Jason's 11 movies, and Freddy close behind with eight, Bell sees no reason why he can't also live to kill another day. "What makes you think it's a trilogy?" he said. "Look at Harry Potter — if there's a richness there and a story to be told, there's no reason not to continue. If I can grow the Jigsaw Killer and reveal more about why he does what he does and what is on his mind, then that's good. I would like to do that."

For now, however, Bell is just looking forward to the "Saw III" release. Bousman promises "more traps in this movie than there have been in any of the other films," while leading lady Smith makes her own pledge concerning the horrifying prospect of a love scene between Jigsaw and his newfound love.

"No!" she laughed, wincing. "Please — we wouldn't put you through that."
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: MacGuffin on August 14, 2006, 04:54:57 PM
(https://xixax.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fus.movies1.yimg.com%2Fmovies.yahoo.com%2Fimages%2Fhv%2Fphoto%2Fmovie_pix%2Flions_gate_films%2Fsaw_iii%2Fj__larose%2Fsawiii.jpg&hash=54c6b16a2091f077592ce84303782da8229514f8)


Trailer here. (http://playlist.yahoo.com/makeplaylist.dll?id=1466882&sdm=web&qtw=480&qth=300)

Release Date: October 27th, 2006 (wide)

Starring: Tobin Bell, Shawnee Smith, Bahar Soomekh, Angus MacFadyen, Dina Meyer
 
Directed By: Darren Lynn Bousman (Saw II)

Premise: Amanda (Shawnee Smith) and Jigsaw (Tobin Bell) kidnap Dr. Lynn Denlon (Bahar Soomekh). She is told that she must keep Jigsaw alive for as long as it takes Jeff (Angus MacFadyen) to complete a game of his own. Racing against the ticking clock of Jigsaw's heartbeat, Lynn and Jeff struggle to make it through each of their tests, unaware that he has a bigger plan for both of them.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: polkablues on August 14, 2006, 05:22:24 PM
Quote from: MacGuffin on August 14, 2006, 04:54:57 PM
(https://xixax.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fus.movies1.yimg.com%2Fmovies.yahoo.com%2Fimages%2Fhv%2Fphoto%2Fmovie_pix%2Flions_gate_films%2Fsaw_iii%2Fj__larose%2Fsawiii.jpg&hash=54c6b16a2091f077592ce84303782da8229514f8)

Even disregarding everything else, that guy in his boxer-briefs is scarier than anything in the first two movies.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: MacGuffin on September 15, 2006, 08:25:26 PM
New Trailer here. (http://playlist.yahoo.com/makeplaylist.dll?id=1482126&sdm=web&qtw=480&qth=300)
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: Derek237 on September 15, 2006, 11:15:24 PM
Yeah I can totally see this becoming a Friday The 13th type deal. Each movie made for as little money as possible, same basic stuff over and over with as much gore and creative kills as possible each time, and every 3 or 4 sequels we'll have Saw: The Final Cut, then Saw: A New Beggining, etc. etc. But it definitley has found itself in a comfortable groove, the halloween season each time. I went to see Saw II around last halloween, and I might as well go see III this year.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: Ravi on September 16, 2006, 12:56:18 AM
I look forward to the posters to the sequels.  The one for Saw IV should feature a foot with one toe missing.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: MacGuffin on October 03, 2006, 06:08:55 PM
Another Trailer. (http://playlist.yahoo.com/makeplaylist.dll?id=1488080&sdm=web&qtw=480&qth=300)
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: MacGuffin on October 10, 2006, 10:57:32 PM
SAW III Poster made with real blood

According to Variety, a vial of blood from SAW star Tobin Bell (Jigsaw) was used to make posters for SAW III.

"We decided to do a poster and he's wearing a red cloak. I was talking to the printer and asked what we could do to get the deepest blood red. I asked if it would be possible to use actual blood. There was silence. He said, 'We could try, but are you serious?' I said I was dead serious," Lionsgate marketing's Tim Palen said.

"He said, 'That's really weird,'" Palen recalled. But Bell agreed, and a trip to the doctor's office was scheduled.

The posters from the first printing, about 1,000 in all, will be sold for $20, minus the first print, which will be auctioned off. All proceeds from the auction and sales will go to the Red Cross.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: MacGuffin on October 11, 2006, 09:25:29 PM
SAW III Poster made with real blood

According to Variety, a vial of blood from SAW star Tobin Bell (Jigsaw) was used to make posters for SAW III.

"We decided to do a poster and he's wearing a red cloak. I was talking to the printer and asked what we could do to get the deepest blood red. I asked if it would be possible to use actual blood. There was silence. He said, 'We could try, but are you serious?' I said I was dead serious," Lionsgate marketing's Tim Palen said.

"He said, 'That's really weird,'" Palen recalled. But Bell agreed, and a trip to the doctor's office was scheduled.

The posters from the first printing, about 1,000 in all, will be sold for $20, minus the first print, which will be auctioned off. All proceeds from the auction and sales will go to the Red Cross.

(https://xixax.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fffmedia.ign.com%2Ffilmforce%2Fimage%2Farticle%2F738%2F738410%2Fsaw3_cape10_1160591215.jpg&hash=2784853ea7135327c25a6946bea27475a46094c4)
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: last days of gerry the elephant on October 11, 2006, 09:33:52 PM
Saw III = More lameness than the previous shitty sequel, III
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: Ravi on October 11, 2006, 09:51:17 PM
Quote from: MacGuffin on October 11, 2006, 09:25:29 PM
SAW III Poster made with real blood

According to Variety, a vial of blood from SAW star Tobin Bell (Jigsaw) was used to make posters for SAW III.

I bet he's glad they didn't go with their first design:

(https://xixax.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg138.imageshack.us%2Fimg138%2F3576%2Fsawxk0.jpg&hash=e4a6b02371c300b130c635014ad9659cb4c2f681)
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: Brazoliange on October 28, 2006, 12:08:56 AM
I really liked this. It could've used another 5 minutes of wrap-up at the end though.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: MacGuffin on October 28, 2006, 12:29:27 PM
Saw III Opens with $14.2 Million!
Source: ShowbizData

Lionsgates' hit horror franchise looks like it will score big for the third Halloween weekend in a row as Saw III grossed an estimated $14.2 million in 3,167 theatres according to ShowbizData.com. That's compared to the $12.1 opening day of Saw II last October. That first day gross points to an opening weekend somewhere between $33 and $35 million compared to the $31.7 million debut of Saw II.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: pumba on October 28, 2006, 01:08:23 PM
I am so sick of these stupid motherfucking movies. Last night the theatre lines were packed with assholes who were all going to see this and resulted in me being 15 minutes late to nee Nightmare in 3d. Fuck Saw III up their stupid, story defying asses.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: MacGuffin on October 28, 2006, 01:16:28 PM
Quote from: shnorff on October 28, 2006, 01:08:23 PM
I am so sick of these stupid motherfucking movies.

Lionsgate readies Saw 4
Source: Moviehole October 19, 2006

According to Bloody Disgusting, Lionsgate has put a "Saw 4" – when there's more sauce, why not the squeeze the heck out of that bottle hey?! – on the fast-track, asking several writers to submit their ideas for the next Jigsaw jaunt.

According to the site, at least four writers have been contacted about writing a fourth instalment in the popular horror series. Tobin Bell, who has played the film's vicious villain since the original, is signed for a further two films following this month's "Saw 3".

At Comic Con earlier this year, the producers confirmed that a "Saw 4" would be happening sooner rather than later.

Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: last days of gerry the elephant on October 28, 2006, 01:57:31 PM
Quote from: shnorff on October 28, 2006, 01:08:23 PM
I am so sick of these stupid motherfucking movies. Last night the theatre lines were packed with assholes who were all going to see this and resulted in me being 15 minutes late to nee Nightmare in 3d. Fuck Saw III up their stupid, story defying asses.

People can be that stupid.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: MacGuffin on January 25, 2007, 04:05:54 PM
*SPOILERS*


I'll give them credit for going a different direction and not necessarily just doing the traps over and over to random people, although this still has that (c'mon, that's what made this series famous). These were probably the highest on the cringe factor, however. But I liked how ultimately the test was between master and apprectice to see if she could carry on his legacy. That relationship was what made this a more interesting and better sequel than the last one (which felt like a rehash of Cube). The final twist left a nice cliffhanger. Lop off (pun intended) about 10 minutes or so, and it would have made for a smoother pace.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: modage on January 27, 2007, 08:48:10 PM
i will still standby the first film as being a really great original horror film and one of the best of the past decade.  the 2nd one was a typical rushed overblown more-is-more sequel which took a huge huge dive from the first one.  this was worse than that.  the characters were a little less annoying than the degenerates of that film but the film was even less interesting.  there was really nothing scary about this either.  if you think doctors have scary jobs, then maybe this is for you.  it was just gross and there is no reason to care about the main dude in the film.  i'm not sure why they offed the cop from the first movie so quickly either as she was one of the only remaining characters with a through line to the other films to do something interesting with.  basically i didnt think it would be any good and it wasnt.  oh, and the editing is annoying as hell.  i think i'm done now.  dead silence had better be good.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: Alexandro on January 28, 2007, 06:41:43 PM
i felt the first one was useless enough. highly moralistic. bad people who do bad things have it coming to them. the shock seems to come from that fact. the fact they had "sins" and are now "paying" for them. serial killers as some sort of penitence for people's sins, even redentors. showy shooting, editing and gimmicks. empty fucking movie whith nothing to say and only horrific if you believe in it's own morals.
Title: Re: Saw III
Post by: matt35mm on January 28, 2007, 07:08:09 PM
I've never seen any of the Saw movies, but from the premise of the first one on, I've gotten the sense that this...

Quote from: Alexandro on January 28, 2007, 06:41:43 PM
highly moralistic. bad people who do bad things have it coming to them. the shock seems to come from that fact. the fact they had "sins" and are now "paying" for them. serial killers as some sort of penitence for people's sins, even redentors. showy shooting, editing and gimmicks. empty fucking movie whith nothing to say and only horrific if you believe in it's own morals.

... is exactly why I would FUCKING HATE IT SO MUCH.

But still not as much as Hard Candy.