Xixax Film Forum

Non-Film Discussion => Real-Life Soundtracks => Topic started by: Sanjuro on October 11, 2003, 10:59:01 AM

Title: phish
Post by: Sanjuro on October 11, 2003, 10:59:01 AM
anybody listen to phish?
Title: phish
Post by: aclockworkjj on October 11, 2003, 02:12:53 PM
yes, I dig phish...tho, I can't stand the trustfund dirt ass hippi crowd.  Try selling me bunk licks again, pricks!  I have dug these guys for a while, and always manage to catch the shows.

You actually made me throw this (http://www.phish.com/drygoods/home/product.html?pid=760CD&cid=5&pg=3) on.

Trey joins dave matthews on the road... (http://phish.com/news/index.php?year=2003#story135)
Title: phish
Post by: NEON MERCURY on October 11, 2003, 07:51:33 PM
...yeah I use to be reeal big into them but .I just stoplistening to them for some reason..I think their awesome talents..

i saw them live once back in 1995.....great show..::damn thats a long time ago::
Title: phish
Post by: Pedro on October 11, 2003, 08:26:17 PM
I like phish alot but ive never seen them live.  i really like jam bands a lot...seen string cheese a few times and widespread and dmb(if you wanna call em a jam band)...and those were all great show...they're killer musicians
Title: phish
Post by: bonanzataz on October 12, 2003, 03:44:37 PM
i think that an untapped area of of dork that not enough people make fun of is the typical phish dork. i mean, there are film dorks, theater dorks, school dorks, but the worst kinds of dorks are the phish dorks because they try to base an entire lifestyle around it. let's get high and download a phish show! the band itself is good, but the people who spend way too much time with it piss me off. at least the the film dorks want to make movies, the theater dorks want to act, and school dorks want to get good grades, go to college and make mommie and daddy lots of money. they have ambition. i'd say that there are a lot of phish dorks out there that want to make music of their own, but most just want to cover phish.

in my opinion, the only phish albums that are really enjoyable are rift, billy breathes, and maybe hoist. the jamming gets old after a while. it's something i'd have fun watching my friends play in their basements, not something i'd pay $70 a ticket for.
Title: phish
Post by: NEON MERCURY on October 14, 2003, 10:45:25 PM
Quote from: bonanzatazi think that an untapped area of of dork that not enough people make fun of is the typical phish dork. i mean, there are film dorks, theater dorks, school dorks, but the worst kinds of dorks are the phish dorks because they try to base an entire lifestyle around it. let's get high and download a phish show! the band itself is good, but the people who spend way too much time with it piss me off. at least the the film dorks want to make movies, the theater dorks want to act, and school dorks want to get good grades, go to college and make mommie and daddy lots of money. they have ambition. i'd say that there are a lot of phish dorks out there that want to make music of their own, but most just want to cover phish.

in my opinion, the only phish albums that are really enjoyable are rift, billy breathes, and maybe hoist. the jamming gets old after a while. it's something i'd have fun watching my friends play in their basements, not something i'd pay $70 a ticket for.


that was funny ...your right.

HERE ARE THE CHARACTERISTICS THAT I HAVE NOTICED..(EITHER POSITVE OR NEGATIVE DEPENDING ON YOUR VIEW)

1.0  they smoke pot b/c they think it makes them cool
2.0  try to act like a hippy but drive their daddy's tahoe to the shows
3.0  think phish is the greatest band on earth
4.0  typical conversation:"like dude trey was awesome . that note he held on the guitar? damn that was killer.  i toked a bowl right afterwords."
5.0  typical conversation #2"yeah , have you heard 4/21/98 , that show had a 45 min. version of tweezer?.."yeah .but on 5/05/00 there was a 54 min . version compltete with dave matthews on guitar as a guest..Now that was fresh"..
Title: phish
Post by: samuelclemens on October 15, 2003, 06:30:47 AM
phish is no more
Title: phish
Post by: Reinhold on October 22, 2003, 10:10:51 PM
must confess that i'm not a big phish fan... don't know too much about the band.  trey is playing with dave matthews and some other people in an upcoming concert series that i may or may not have tickets to see... still waiting to see if the (great and powerful) Warehouse has decided to grant me tickets before they go on sale to the public.  

they're playing with Spyboy/Emmylou Harris. anybody know who these people are?
Title: phish
Post by: aclockworkjj on October 22, 2003, 10:37:33 PM
Quote from: samuelclemensphish is no more
no, no, no...they will be back...trust this kid.
Title: phish
Post by: godardian on October 22, 2003, 11:26:14 PM
I don't mean for this to be overkill, but: Phish stands (stood?) for everything I think pop music SHOULDN'T be.
Title: phish
Post by: Sleuth on October 22, 2003, 11:32:10 PM
Moreso than Britney?  Well, okay.

What's your deal with "pop music" anyway?  Why not just accept it as music alone
Title: phish
Post by: aclockworkjj on October 22, 2003, 11:37:18 PM
Quote from: godardianI don't mean for this to be overkill, but: Phish stands (stood?) for everything I think pop music SHOULDN'T be.
how do you figure it as "POP"???....seriously...
Title: phish
Post by: godardian on October 23, 2003, 12:03:55 AM
Quote from: aclockworkjj
Quote from: godardianI don't mean for this to be overkill, but: Phish stands (stood?) for everything I think pop music SHOULDN'T be.
how do you figure it as "POP"???....seriously...

It's part of popular culture, isn't it? I posted a long explanation about how I don't acknowledge petty, silly distinctions from people who think their sub-genre of pop isn't pop. If you can go to the record store and buy it, it's pop, everything from The Carpenters to The Sex Pistols, from Noel Coward to The Who. I think splitting it up into dull little categories (if I never, ever hear words like "electroclash" or "punk-pop" again, it'll be too soon, and don't even get me started on goddamn "SUB-Pop") betrays a narrow-mindedness and lack of real sophistication on the part of the person doing such categorizing.

To me, there's no emotion in Phish whatsoever. The lyrics and melodies aren't there. It's all technical skill- MERE technical skill, unimpressive and irrelevant as instrumental proficiency is for this type of music- stretched out to lengths of ungodly boredom. It's worse than Radiohead! You need drugs to enjoy it. You need to have it in a special little category of musicianship to enjoy it. It doesn't stand on its own the way the best pop music does.

I will say that, little as I actually care for Britney Spears, she understands more important things about making records than Phish does. And her stage antics may be ridiculously stupid, but not as ridiculously stupid as jumping on trampolines and employing vacuum cleaners.

The only pro with Phish that I can think of is that they have a better Ben and Jerry's flavor than Britney.
Title: phish
Post by: godardian on October 23, 2003, 12:05:10 AM
Quote from: tremolosloth

What's your deal with "pop music" anyway?  

It's awfully important to me; I'd count it as a fairly vital part of my life and worldview. I've found myself moved by a particularly spectacular pop song in a way nothing else can move me. I don't think Phish exists in the same world as that ideal, though. They display no understanding of it.
Title: phish
Post by: Newtron on October 23, 2003, 01:25:56 PM
Quote from: tremoloslothWhat's your deal with "pop music" anyway?  
He's gay.
Title: phish
Post by: godardian on October 23, 2003, 01:39:06 PM
Quote from: Newtron
Quote from: tremoloslothWhat's your deal with "pop music" anyway?  
He's gay.

Does that mean Phish is a "straight thing," then?

I like my explanation better, both of what pop music is and what Phish is. I'd hate to begrudge straight people the opportunity to be moved and compelled by a really good record... and I know some who have excellent taste in music, and whose revulsion toward the wearying noodling of pointless jam-bands well surpasses my own.

Straight or gay, Phish is a terrible band that makes terrible records. Their songs would be so bad they're funny, except those are some loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong, creaky jokes...   :? '

I can't stand the Grateful Dead, either. If you don't have anything interesting or relevant to say, why take 20 minutes per song to say it?
Title: phish
Post by: aclockworkjj on October 23, 2003, 01:49:54 PM
I guess I can see where you are coming from....their lyrics are goofy, goofy, goofy....I don't know if I would consider them pop though still....

I like this (http://www.momadance.com/music/1993%20-%205%20Shows/02-20-93%20Roxy%20Theater%20-%20Atlanta%20GA/ph93-02-20d3t04.mp3) a lot though...sure, it makes littel sense, but I don't find it too "poppy"...

Quote from: NewtronHe's gay.
was that necessary?
Title: phish
Post by: Ghostboy on October 23, 2003, 01:57:43 PM
I don't like Phish either, and while I agree for the most part with Godardian's assesment, I will admit that it can be fun to listen to really talented musicians riff off each other. Good jazz is a better example, but jam bands work on the same principal, to an extent. From a technical POV, you don't have toe be on drugs to enjoy them. Not that I DO enjoy them, because they sorta annoy me.

I do, however, enjoy Tortoise.
Title: phish
Post by: Sleuth on October 23, 2003, 02:37:50 PM
I've never even heard Phish

well, I saw them on SNL, but I don't remember it (no I wasn't high trying to enjoy phish haw haw)

But I was just taking the opportunity to understand Godardian's point of view..of which I disagree
Title: phish
Post by: Ghostboy on October 23, 2003, 02:56:49 PM
Godardian is correct to an extent. Pop music, short for popular, encompasses everything that captures the affection of the public. But it's also a genre unto itself. Plenty of music majors have probably studied the trends and could analyze it far better than I, but there's just something about music that classifies it as pop. It doesn't necessarily mean shallow, it's simply in the sound. A given pop song can then be broken down by its various influences, resulting in all those sub-genres.

If we take the literal definition of pop music to heart, what happens when pop music isn't popular anymore? Do The Who go back to simply being Rock? What do you call Britney Spears' music?Dance/electronica/virginal/erotica?
Title: phish
Post by: aclockworkjj on October 23, 2003, 04:05:10 PM
Quote from: tremoloslothI've never even heard Phish
start with Gamehendge (http://raffstafarian.homeip.net/D/mp3/phish%2093-03-22%20Gamehendge/)....
Title: phish
Post by: TheVoiceOfNick on October 24, 2003, 02:51:14 PM
I've never heard Phish, don't like Fish, but love the Ben and Jerry's flavor Phish Food (based on the band)...

Nick
Title: phish
Post by: bonanzataz on October 24, 2003, 04:02:34 PM
Quote from: godardianI can't stand the Grateful Dead, either.

and you were REALLY becoming one of my favorite members of the board.
Title: phish
Post by: godardian on October 24, 2003, 04:04:39 PM
Quote from: bonanzataz
Quote from: godardianI can't stand the Grateful Dead, either.

and you were REALLY becoming one of my favorite members of the board.

:cry:

...you a Deadhead?
Title: phish
Post by: bonanzataz on October 24, 2003, 04:24:19 PM
proud of it. i would start a thread about it, but i just feel like it's pointless to talk about why you love the music you love. it either clicks or it doesn't. for me, they click in a BIG way. the dead can usually wrap their songs up when they're needed to, unlike phish who keep the jams going FOREVER. the only thing i don't like about the dead are those elongated drum solos. same for both of my parents who say that's when they would go to the bathroom.
Title: phish
Post by: aclockworkjj on October 24, 2003, 04:32:58 PM
Quote from: bonanzatazunlike phish who keep the jams going FOREVER.

apparently you haven't heard sume versions of Dark Star, Space, or the Cryptical Envelopment-->drums-->Cryptical-->The Other One...or Help-->Slip-->Frank.....etc., etc....

ps. The Dead w/ Pigpen was the best...
Title: phish
Post by: bonanzataz on October 24, 2003, 04:38:51 PM
well apparently, you didn't read what i said. i said they wrap it up when they need to. their jams have purpose and emotion (which is what godardian complained about, phish having no emotion) and aren't about being technically awesome (which they are). i can listen to a dark star jam all the way through and not get sick of it (though, and i know a really good deadhead wouldn't say this, but i prefer the concise, to the point tracks on their studio albums).
Title: phish
Post by: aclockworkjj on October 24, 2003, 04:49:50 PM
Quote from: bonanzataz(though, and i know a really good deadhead wouldn't say this, but i prefer the concise, to the point tracks on their studio albums).
oh no...I don't believe...kinda makes an opinion lose it's otherwise ooommmpff.

Just giving ya shit...

Here (http://www.hyperorange.com/dead_3_31_94/dead_standing_on_the_moon.mp3) is a perfect example of something that shoulda only been played live...the only tune I can possibly think of that I would rather hear the studio version...is Shakedown St.  

However: I will completly agree if you perfer the studio stuff cause of quality, nothing pisses me off more than a shitty sounding show.
Title: phish
Post by: Witkacy on October 24, 2003, 05:00:55 PM
Although I scrolled quickly through most of it... why would anybody spend time writing about Phish.... I live way too close to Vermont and the whole hippie shit thing.  If you're a fan... you're just looking for other fans.
Title: phish
Post by: RegularKarate on October 25, 2003, 02:55:07 PM
Phish is really a phucking boring band.  The term "Jam band" makes me want to vomit.

I saw too many of my good friends turn into phucking hippies after highschool to even remotely enjoy Phish.

Gratefull Dead is certainly not my thing.  Sad thing about the Dead is that thier best songs are the short and sweet radio songs.  If you write a thousand songs, I guess a few are gonna end up sounding good and the rest is just filler for the million stoners out there.

As far as Pop goes, I can see what Godardian's saying, but he's taking it too far.  Pop is Top 40.  The basic key to being a pop band is having a video on MTV (if you're post 70s that is).  I don't think Phish has any videos on MTV, but I don't know... they certainly don't cry Pop.  They do make me sleepy though.
Title: phish
Post by: bonanzataz on October 26, 2003, 03:03:31 PM
they made a video for down with disease.
Title: phish
Post by: aclockworkjj on October 26, 2003, 03:07:49 PM
I think there is a Bouncin' around the room one out there too...