Xixax Film Forum

Creative Corner => Filmmakers' Workshop => Topic started by: Jon on January 28, 2003, 10:28:22 PM

Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Jon on January 28, 2003, 10:28:22 PM
I'm gonna be buying a new editing sofware for my new computer, I was wondering what the best one is?

Final Cut Pro? Premiere? Adobe? I'm not quite sure...

Thanks very much. Very appreciative.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Cecil on January 28, 2003, 10:33:41 PM
have you gotten your new computer yet? cause if its not a mac you cant run final cut pro.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: sphinx on January 28, 2003, 10:33:51 PM
it really depends what kind of computer you've got: mac or pc.  for pc, adobe premiere is a pretty good choice.  there's a wider array of editing software for the mac than there is for the pc....perhaps someone can give you more info on that.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Jon on January 28, 2003, 10:38:11 PM
Quotehave you gotten your new computer yet? cause if its not a mac you cant run final cut pro.

Aw, fuck. Well, I'm just so used to Windows. Is Final Cut worth it? Is there anything on the PC that can even compare?
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Cecil on January 28, 2003, 10:40:12 PM
well thats okay, just use premiere. you have firewire on your pc dont you?
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Jon on January 28, 2003, 10:48:33 PM
Well, I will, yeah. Is the editor that comes with Windows XP any good? I think I'll just go with Premiere, just wondering.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Cecil on January 28, 2003, 10:53:04 PM
Quote from: JonIs the editor that comes with Windows XP any good?

ive never used it, but its probably a very basic app. if you only wanna do simple 3 minute improvs with your friends then it might do, but if you wanna do some serious work (not that theres anything wrong with 3 minute improvs) then get premiere.

pm xixax and ask him if he still has his copy for sale.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Satcho9 on January 28, 2003, 11:04:43 PM
Final Cut Pro is overrated, I have used it extensively and It has its bells and whistles but nothing a good PC program cant handle..
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Cecil on January 28, 2003, 11:46:28 PM
Quote from: Satcho9Final Cut Pro is overrated, I have used it extensively and It has its bells and whistles but nothing a good PC program cant handle..

exactly. who needs real time effects and color correction without any additional hardware or software, or being able to edit offline rt, giving you 40 minutes of footage per gigabyte and then once youre finished fcp will recapture from the master tapes in hi rez to the frame only the footage you actually used in the project, allowing you to store practically all of your rushes from your feature film and edit on your laptop wherever with whoever, bringing the entire movie with you without carrying several external hard drives with you. pfff, who needs that.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Satcho9 on January 29, 2003, 12:21:13 AM
Fucking apple nuts.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Cecil on January 29, 2003, 12:33:05 AM
ignorant apple basher
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: RegularKarate on January 29, 2003, 12:32:34 PM
Quote from: Satcho9Final Cut Pro is overrated, I have used it extensively and It has its bells and whistles but nothing a good PC program cant handle..

Well yeah, except that you're so wrong about that.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Jon on January 29, 2003, 03:24:47 PM
What does Final Cut have that Premiere doesn't?
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Cecil on January 29, 2003, 04:49:31 PM
Quote from: cecil b. demented

...real time effects and color correction without any additional hardware or software, or being able to edit offline rt, giving you 40 minutes of footage per gigabyte and then once youre finished fcp will recapture from the master tapes in hi rez to the frame only the footage you actually used in the project, allowing you to store practically all of your rushes from your feature film and edit on your laptop wherever with whoever, bringing the entire movie with you without carrying several external hard drives with you...

also i find it more stable, especially if youre using crappy windows 95 or 98. but dont worry, premiere is still great
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Satcho9 on January 29, 2003, 05:00:10 PM
Listen, I have used Final Cut Pro 1-3 and i never said it sucked or anything, I just said it was overrated. I however prefer PC programs. Simple as that, its a free country, you can use what you want.
Title: Premiere
Post by: Recce on February 06, 2003, 12:54:03 PM
I realize this whole conversation has been over for like a week, but I would just like to say that Adobe Premiere is a great program. Its fairly simple, solid, a bit tricky with mp3's though. Plus, its compatible with all the other Adobe programs, such as Photoshop, After effects, etc. So if you have a fast PC that can handle editing and an army of Adobe softwares to back it up, there's no reason why you can't be as productive as someone with a G4 mac and Final Cut Pro.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: ReelHotGames on February 21, 2003, 04:13:01 PM
To help the original poster out, if you go PC use Premiere if you go Mac use Final Cut Pro

They both stack up about the same when all is said and done, it's just a different layout and learning curve.

But if you go MAC these are the things to consider - buy a machine that you won;t have to add onto, because it's more expensive than building your own PC, but most new MACS will do what you need out of the box.

And if you go PC then think about what type of capturing hardware you'll use, because it makes a difference, I have had great luck running with the Pinnacle DV500 plus, but that's an extra 500 on your cost, and if you go with a basic $40 firewire card compatability WILL be an issue.

The plus on PC side is the ease of upgrade, and how inexpensive it is.
Title: um
Post by: KingBlackDeath on February 27, 2003, 12:47:13 AM
Is there something bad about Vegas Video that I'm missing?
Sonic Foundry makes it and they make Acid, so where's the rub?
I never see it mentioned in RES or anywhere, but my friend has it and I've been using it and I like it plenty.
We currently only do little mess around stuff.
If I want to make an actual real DV Film when I get my new computer is Vegas no good for REAL things? I DO want as much color correction possibilities as possible, though.
Does anyone know anything about the AVID DV Xpress 3.5 program?
It seems like that would be great.

I'm going to have a lot of questions in the upcoming months (as I'm buying a DV camera, a new computer, and probably shooting my first "picture" soon) so everybody get ready for the shitstorm!
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Recce on February 27, 2003, 08:55:03 AM
Well, I haven't personally used Avid, but I hear its a pretty solid program. However, I'd have to say Premiere is better for PC's and Final Cut Pro for Macs (from what I've heard, but this isn't terribly reliable info), as was said earlier in this post. I'm also not sure what your Vegas program thing is, but judging by the name, I'm guessing it's one of those click and drag type of programs that doesn;t give you much control over sound. Both FCP 3 and Premiere 6.5 allow for good control of sound. It takes a tiny bit of getting used to at first if you've never used them before, but trust me, it'll be well worth the fiddling around afterwards.

As for your capture card, I know some will recommend that you get a Pinnacle card or something else, but if your straped for cash(which I'm guessing you will be after buying a new camera and computer), a low-end 'pyro' card or something like it will do fine. I bought a card for 100$(Canadien, so probly like 12$ American) and it worked fine. The rest of my computer was the problem, though, so I bought a Mac. If you have the cash to buy a Mac, though, go for it. Once you get past the troubles caused by your PC orientation, their great and solid and they come with capture cards, so less fiddling.

As for your camera questions on another thread, here's my 2 cents. I'm not an expert on cameras, so I don't know how you could get certain looks, but I got myself a Digital 8 camera. Not as chrystal clear as a mini DV camera, but for compatibility reasons, they're great. With a digital 8, you can capture from digital 8 tapes, hi-8 tapes, and video 8 tapes. Plus, you can use it to capture analog footage from your TV, VCR and even DVD player by hooking up the camera to the DVD player and the firewire to the computer. I'm not sure if you could do all this with a Mini DV, I'm guessing so, but the three different tapes you could play in it were a seller for me and they've helped me out so far. Plus, I think they're a little less expensive then mini DV.
Title: Re: um
Post by: Xixax on February 27, 2003, 09:39:16 AM
Quote from: BigBadDeathIs there something bad about Vegas Video that I'm missing?
Vegas Video is more of a consumer level production tool. It's fine if it gets the job done for you, but you won't find any pro editing houses using Vegas like you might find them using Avid, Media 100, Final Cut or (to a lesser extent) Premiere.

You only need as much software power as you need, and if Vegas Video does it for you, then I say rock on with it. When you outgrow it you will start to feel it and then you can move up to Premiere.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: aclockworkjj on March 02, 2003, 11:19:39 AM
Quote from: Satcho9Fucking apple nuts.

I stand united with Cecil...I will admit it, I used to use a PC....and made the switch.  It's like an addiction comparable to drinkin' Jack and Cokes all mornin'.  It has taken over my life, I dream off Mac optical pro mice, the G4 design, oh, and those super drives.....that's when the dream gets good.  Not to mention the quirkly little noises it makes when it's statrting a program.  Mac's.....the apple of my eye!

Really not that big of a nut...just having some fun. 8)
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: TripMcKneely on March 02, 2003, 08:49:56 PM
don't get an apple...trust...if you really want final cut pro that bad, it will soon be available for pc's...if you get an apple you are their slave, you cant build or upgrade them as easy as a pc, you are truly at their mercy.  besides, XP is the shit right now as far as opperating systems go.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Cecil on March 02, 2003, 09:01:43 PM
Quote from: TripMcKneelyfinal cut pro that bad, it will soon be available for pc's

not true.


anyway the guy says he allready got his computer so.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Xixax on March 02, 2003, 09:05:36 PM
It's a never-ending debate. And I don't think there's a right answer. It's all personal preference.

While I am a Windows guy, I can also say that I wouldn't lose sleep if I had to switch to Mac.

The thing about a macintosh is that if you buy a good system from the start, you won't *need* to upgrade for a long time. Mac software works pretty great on older machines, it's just slower. Not like Windows apps that require faster video cards or processors.

It's all preference. No matter what you get, you won't go wrong.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: UglyApe on March 03, 2003, 09:02:28 PM
I use Pinnacle Studios 7.   Seems to work pretty well for me.   It's a preety decent PC program.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: sphinx on March 03, 2003, 10:18:10 PM
Quote from: UglyApeI use Pinnacle Studios 7.   Seems to work pretty well for me.   It's a preety decent PC program.

except for capturing and exporting.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: UglyApe on March 03, 2003, 10:41:20 PM
If you have enough ram, capturing isn't a problem.   I've never had any problem exporting.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Recce on March 03, 2003, 11:24:24 PM
I used a PC for editing for 2 years. Although it wasn;t top of the line, I think it was a lot of trouble for nothing. Now that I got a mac, i realize all the crap I had to go through for no particular reason. Not only do PC's crash a lot more then macs, but compatibility issues for capture cards, etc. don't matter. They come built in. I got my mac out fo the box, hooked up a firewire and installed final cut pro and I was ready to edit. With my pc, iut took me a week to get it configured properly and learn all the quirks. The only complaint I have is the one I got didn't have enoguh ram, it came with 256mb of ram. so I had to buy an extra 512 mb. As for the whole you cant upgrade thing, i don't think itss a viable excuse. If you get a tower, you can add stuff like dvd-rw etc and ram. as for the eMacs or iMacs, you can add ram on them too. and what else could you possibly want to upgrade to? Its true that adding a Hard Drive is kind of annoying as you have to get an external one, but hey, if your computer doesn't crash in the middle of editing, i  think its worth it.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: The Silver Bullet on March 06, 2003, 11:09:44 PM
I own a PC. I've only ever used iMovie while on a Mac, and it sucked [hard]. I can't comment on Final Cut Pro. I've never used it.

Anyway. Having had some pretty bad experiences with Adobe Premiere and Pinnacle Studio 7 not being able to do what I wanted to [anymore], I went for Sonic Foundry Vegas Video. It is a wonderul program, and I would reccomend it to anyone and everyone looking for an alternative to the norm [which is Premiere]. Check it out. It's quite the program.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: Xixax on March 06, 2003, 11:36:15 PM
Quote from: The Silver BulletI own a PC. I've only ever used iMovie while on a Mac, and it sucked [hard]. I can't comment on Final Cut Pro. I've never used it.

Anyway. Having had some pretty bad experiences with Adobe Premiere and Pinnacle Studio 7 not being able to do what I wanted to [anymore], I went for Sonic Foundry Vegas Video. It is a wonderul program, and I would reccomend it to anyone and everyone looking for an alternative to the norm [which is Premiere]. Check it out. It's quite the program.

I have a hard time believing that Vegas is more powerful than Premiere.

I was a Pinnacle user for several years, and I had MAJOR problems with their drivers, and how they worked with Premiere. The system crashes were unbelievable. If there was a fault with the setup, I'd bet money that Pinnacle's sucky drivers were to blame - not Premiere.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: The Silver Bullet on March 07, 2003, 01:20:48 AM
Well, with Vegas you've got a swag of filters and effects that you need After Effects for with Premiere, and there is no render time for a preview of what you're watching, it just does it without any hassles. Real time.

I swear by Vegas. Especially over Adobe. The program is much more stable than Premiere too. But to each his own. I know that there are Adobe fans that wouldn't go near Vegas with a ten foot pole, but personally, I'm editing my videos faster, so what do I care...
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: aclockworkjj on March 07, 2003, 02:33:32 PM
Quote from: The Silver BulletI've only ever used iMovie while on a Mac, and it sucked [hard].

iMovie is about as useful as the Windows Moviemaker....great for mother to edit little jonny's soccer games, but a total peice of crap.
Title: Editing systems.
Post by: The Silver Bullet on March 07, 2003, 04:18:52 PM
And as I've said, I haven't used Final Cut, so I can't say anything, although I do have a friend who swears by it [he is using it to cut a feature I wrote and he directed in Calgary last year right now, actually]. But Vegas really is something worth checking out if Adobe supporters can get their heads around the fact that Premiere ain't as good...