Started by matt35mm, November 24, 2017, 07:59:23 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: matt35mm on November 24, 2017, 07:59:23 PMIt's a very lovely and weird film, just as we've come to expect. Gorgeous. Full on indulgence in film looking like film, the opposite of digital. A bit of a sister film to THE MASTER, I feel, without being quite as intense. But there are many parallels. The score is indeed very good and front and center. Don't want to say too much more at the moment, and am still processing, but I am pleased and feeling that cinema high. PTA, Vicky Krieps, and Lesley Manville were there for a Q&A, which was wonderful, although most of it covered info that we all already know.
Quote from: KJ on November 24, 2017, 08:51:39 PMi'm getting confused by the running time. the guy in the reddit thread says it's 2 and a hour, despite the previously report that it's very short.
Quote from: wilberfan on November 24, 2017, 08:51:50 PMI saw the film today, too, and just posted my fairly spoiler-free thoughts here. I'm willing to answer any questions, as well, I guess. Like Matt35mm, I'm still kind of vibrating (only got home about 30 minutes ago) from the experience. As with most PTA films, a second viewing would make a tremendous difference in helping to process our thoughts and feelings about it.
Quote from: BigSock on November 24, 2017, 09:07:17 PMLink doesn't work
Quote from: FilmCell on November 24, 2017, 10:00:12 PMPost the audio you recorded from the discussion.
Quote from: FilmCell on November 25, 2017, 02:08:59 AMWait, so you "HATED" inherent Vice?
Quote from: wilburfan on redditwill probably never be able to get thru Inherent Vice a second time.
Quote from: wilberfan on November 24, 2017, 08:52:53 PMQuote from: KJ on November 24, 2017, 08:51:39 PMi'm getting confused by the running time. the guy in the reddit thread says it's 2 and a hour, despite the previously report that it's very short.I informally clocked the version we saw today at 125 minutes, with another 5 minutes of credits.