Pete's Dragon

Started by matt35mm, February 21, 2016, 11:06:16 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.



the earlier link i provided was to the EW slideshow, then because i was trying to google the trailer release date i found the full EW article.

QuoteFirst things first: The original Elliott — he of tubby belly, fire breath, and goofy, bucktooth demeanor — isn't completely gone. "Certain things about the original design we loved: Big jaw, big snout, and a clumsy quality that we really wanted to not completely forget about," says director David Lowery, who treated those essential traits of Elliott as but the tabula rasa from which they could build a new creature.

But the first thing to go? Those hot pink spikes and wild neon haircut. "We explored pink, just to see what would happen," Lowery admits, but since this Elliott lives in a photo-real terrain, the bold splash of pink didn't exactly blend in with the foliage. "From the get-go, the aesthetic was always to make everything feel as handmade as possible, including effects," Lowery continues. "To really have it feel like a blur between a very grounded realistic world and a world in which a big green dragon that can turn invisible can exist." (Lowery's grounded approach may also apply to his next project: Disney's just-announced live-action remake of Peter Pan.)

"David saw this furry, soft dragon that kids could imagine, when they go into the woods, could actually be there," production designer Jade Healy adds, explaining that the 2016 Elliott is based primarily in the world of domestic mammals. Medieval illustrations and reptilian dragon archetypes were swapped for a more canine approach in order to build a soft, furry creature who wouldn't be as frightening in a more realistic setting.

Crazy as it sounds, another big part of Elliott's reinvention came from hours upon hours of funny animal videos online. To nail down the dragon's inelegant movements, animators at New Zealand effects workshop Weta went deep into a zoological YouTube spiral. "There's one video of a giant panda tumbling in his cave, and we looked at that again and again as our Elliott — this big animal who just doesn't know what to do with his body," says Healy.

Other animals are at play in the roughly 20-foot-tall beast, including the wings of an Australian flying fox, the fur of a polar bear, a roar somewhere in the vicinity of "lion, tiger, and elephant," and, according to Lowery, the idiosyncratic tics of another persnickety species. "On a personal level, I don't even see my dog at all...I see a cat," says the director with a chuckle. "So much of Elliott's behavior, when I gave direction, would just be based on this thing my cat did that morning when he was first waking up."

here is a legit photo of a flying fox:

Just Withnail

Look, up in the sky!

It's a cat!

It's a dog!

No it's...a flying fox!

No no no, it's a polar bear!

I tell you, that's an elephant.

A flying elephant?

Shut up you guys - it's PETE'S DRAGON!

Thank you thank you, I'm here all week.

Jeremy Blackman

This is worth reposting (from the David Lowery thread):

Quote from: Lottery on February 19, 2016, 05:05:15 PMMaybe they were going for this?

First thing I was reminded of.


new trailer tomorrow, there's a poster and a trailer for the trailer:


I just love that cut from close to wide when he jumps off the cliff.


Jeremy Blackman


Wow it looks so freakin good. I can't wait.


I really really hope this film is a success, it looks wonderful.



Right outside my apartment in Hollywood. Gonna pop my El Capitan cherry with this movie.


Quote from: matt35mm on July 24, 2016, 03:21:46 PM
Gonna pop my El Capitan cherry...

i feel compelled to dissuade you from doing this.  it's one of the more regrettable ways i've wasted money of late.  saw finding dory there.  it's an utter tourist trap with all the inconveniences of going to the theatre where the movie is accompanied by the constant hum-to-roar of antsy children.  it makes enjoying a movie a chore.  screen and sound quality aren't ideal either.

i suppose you could go to a really late show in the middle of the week.  there is some charm to the historical aspects of the theatre, but i wouldn't recommend it.  i'd say go see it somewhere else first and go a second time for the sake of going to the el capitan, if you must.


Ah, good to know. I had figured screen and sound quality would be top notch (they certainly promote it as such). But I trust you. Thanks!


I think it's in 3D there which makes it not the best option for that reason alone.


Yes, I was going to ask you whether 3D was the way to go on this... and now I have the answer.

Guess I'll remain an El Capitan virgin for a little while longer.