Author Topic: Some of what I'm listening to..  (Read 6769 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sigur Rós

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2794
  • The H.W. of Xixax...
  • Respect: +7
Some of what I'm listening to..
« Reply #30 on: March 29, 2003, 08:24:12 AM »
0
I'm ignorant!

neatahwanta

  • The Meeting with the Goddess
  • ***
  • Posts: 321
  • Respect: +1
Some of what I'm listening to..
« Reply #31 on: March 29, 2003, 12:59:39 PM »
0
Quote from: Raikus
Most... overrated... band... ever.


Quote from: Raikus
And I love the Foo Fighters...


Like I said....no hope.

phil marlowe

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +1
Some of what I'm listening to..
« Reply #32 on: March 30, 2003, 05:24:43 AM »
0
Quote from: neatahwanta
I


yeah.

Sigur Rós

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2794
  • The H.W. of Xixax...
  • Respect: +7
Some of what I'm listening to..
« Reply #33 on: March 30, 2003, 08:03:32 AM »
0
neatahwanta.........Is this guy French! He's kind of arrogant!

Pubrick

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 12170
  • Lynchian identity mystery
  • Respect: +769
Some of what I'm listening to..
« Reply #34 on: March 30, 2003, 08:25:43 AM »
0
hahahh. i'm stayin out of this wave. still tho, haha.
endless 'nothing is what it seems'-isms

Cecil

  • Guest
Some of what I'm listening to..
« Reply #35 on: March 30, 2003, 10:43:30 AM »
0
i still listen to nirvana today, and its still great.

neatahwanta

  • The Meeting with the Goddess
  • ***
  • Posts: 321
  • Respect: +1
Some of what I'm listening to..
« Reply #36 on: March 30, 2003, 04:41:37 PM »
0
Haha, I guess I touched a nerve.  In a few years some of you will listen to good music...and know what the fuck you're talking about.

Instead of attacking me for being arrogant, perhaps you should be attacking someone who opines, "Nirvana was over-rated, but I love the Foo Fighters."

Nothin' against Foo....I happen to like Dave's music myself...wouldn't actually buy and album (hey, you know, I'm so arrogant that its beneath me), but everyone except the deaf would recognize that Nirvana was orders of magnitude above The Foo, creatively, recklessly, and even in terms of song writing.  Hell, ask Dave himself, I'm sure he'd say the same.

No French...1/2 American brown dog, 1/2 Ukrainian.

Jeremy Blackman

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 10862
  • Respect: +1268
Some of what I'm listening to..
« Reply #37 on: March 30, 2003, 04:46:32 PM »
0
Quote from: neatahwanta
perhaps you should be attacking someone who opines...


No. Opinions should not be attacked.  :roll:
"Hunger is the purest sin"

Raikus

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1459
  • Banksy was here
  • Respect: 0
    • http://www.ideaity.com
Some of what I'm listening to..
« Reply #38 on: March 31, 2003, 09:35:36 AM »
0
Quote from: neatahwanta
Instead of attacking me for being arrogant, perhaps you should be attacking someone who opines, "Nirvana was over-rated, but I love the Foo Fighters."


Hey, nothing like taking stuff out of context I guess. I never made a direct comparison between the Foo Fighters and Nirvana. Both of the statements you so conveniently combined were in separate threads and in responses to separate comments. I never said Nirvana was a bad band, in fact, I said "Nirvana was a great band." I also said I love the Foo Fighters. They know how to make good, fun music that rocks. Of course Nirvana was a better band than Foo, but I still contend that Nirvana wasn't the be-all-end-all revolutionary band in music that they've been proclaimed to be. And there's the just of my argument.

Make sure you read thoroughly this time neat, and respond accordingly.
Yes, to dance beneath the diamond sky with one hand waving free, silhouetted by the sea, circled by the circus sands, with all memory and fate driven deep beneath the waves, let me forget about today until tomorrow.

neatahwanta

  • The Meeting with the Goddess
  • ***
  • Posts: 321
  • Respect: +1
Some of what I'm listening to..
« Reply #39 on: March 31, 2003, 07:43:13 PM »
0
Quote from: Jeremy Blackman
Quote from: neatahwanta
perhaps you should be attacking someone who opines...


No. Opinions should not be attacked.  :roll:


They should be when they are wack, like yours.

 :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:

neatahwanta

  • The Meeting with the Goddess
  • ***
  • Posts: 321
  • Respect: +1
Some of what I'm listening to..
« Reply #40 on: March 31, 2003, 07:45:33 PM »
0
Quote from: Raikus
Quote from: neatahwanta
Instead of attacking me for being arrogant, perhaps you should be attacking someone who opines, "Nirvana was over-rated, but I love the Foo Fighters."


Hey, nothing like taking stuff out of context I guess. I never made a direct comparison between the Foo Fighters and Nirvana. Both of the statements you so conveniently combined were in separate threads and in responses to separate comments. I never said Nirvana was a bad band, in fact, I said "Nirvana was a great band." I also said I love the Foo Fighters. They know how to make good, fun music that rocks. Of course Nirvana was a better band than Foo, but I still contend that Nirvana wasn't the be-all-end-all revolutionary band in music that they've been proclaimed to be. And there's the just of my argument.

Make sure you read thoroughly this time neat, and respond accordingly.


Sure, revise your views...good idea.

 

DMCA & Copyright | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy