Author Topic: talent gone to waste  (Read 11694 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Fernando

  • satan's little helper
  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2228
  • Respect: +227
Re: talent gone to waste
« Reply #75 on: August 03, 2005, 05:00:32 PM »
0
Quote from: MacGuffin


Wahlberg Will Quit Acting at 40



Is there really a point to make such a statement? How many times ppl have said I'll never do this again or I'm retiring for good...

Besides, with the exception of Huckabee's as noted above his latest movies range from mediocre to awful.

Also this reminds me a news just read at imdb, Garner and Affleck to reteam for Daredevil 2, wasn't affleck retiring from action films? And that in particularly.  :elitist:

polkablues

  • Child of Myth
  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 7038
  • Respect: +1758
Re: talent gone to waste
« Reply #76 on: August 03, 2005, 05:45:43 PM »
0
Quote from: Fernando
Also this reminds me a news just read at imdb, Garner and Affleck to reteam for Daredevil 2, wasn't affleck retiring from action films? And that in particularly.  :elitist:


I think he was under contract for a sequel from the moment he signed on to do the first one.
Now you're in the *spoiler* place.

modage

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 10761
  • Respect: +698
    • Floating Heads
Re: talent gone to waste
« Reply #77 on: August 03, 2005, 07:06:34 PM »
0
can we make it 35 instead?
Christopher Nolan's directive was clear to everyone in the cast and crew: Use CGI only as a last resort.

 

DMCA & Copyright | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy