oh where to begin...
foreplay naturally...the author, the text, the meaning...talk dirty daddy
case in point...one must first have a sexual impulse, which strangely enough may be the derivative of a residual link in the ever continuing communicative chain(to be discussed later?)...let us name this one the author...for it is through this communicator the text originates...which is quite bluntly, the enlarged cock or the swollen clitoris...raw textual ready to be red, read, blue or blew...at times the book will read like a medical journal...then again a romance novel, love letter, hate mail,porno flicker, or session with a therapist will fill the thrill...what one intends to deliver through the sexual act will never be exactly what the recipient receives in meaning...whether the intention is pure or otherwise the limitless physical and psychological warfare being waged muddies whatever meaning might possibly exist..."deconstruction is energetic and uncomprimising" as is the sex act..."a hunter of meanings" like two lovers humping with purpose...for what, for what, for what...to fill a void, repeal rejection, effect affection, provide protection...the meanings are limitless and eternal...if one fucks for fun another is simultaneously fucked for faithfulness and if one makes love when hurt they in turn hurt the love they make...either whey, straight or ghey, this night, that dey...one must say that the sexual energy being transfered is imbued with multiple meaning and possibly misread by those who would mislead or even choose not to read...the text...another definition to follow
"the most valuable function of deconstruction is the removal of facades and the revelation of truth-the dirty, complex ambiguous truth" ... similarly, anyone who has been the screw or the driver, the pen or the paper, the victim or the raper, knows full well that good sex, great sex, the most intensual con sensual sext will strip away the false and leave nothing in its wake but this raw flaw of intricately entagled truth...whether that was the intention of the author or the quest of the referent I believe the result is always the same...I do not believe it is frequently tapped and that is unfortunate...like great seventeen year hold ass that simply must wait these truths are there for the taking but the price to be paid for indulgence is stiff...
the signifier, the signified and the referent...the relationship must be examined in a discussion of masturbation and the integral role it might play in the discussion of an author and his text being detatched from the author of the meaning...in this sense i might say text can also be viewed as a script that one creates in order to lay down tracks for a sexual journey...i would add this definition should not be limited to the fantastical solo act but also as an addittion to the previous definition discussed above...does one author a text or script for sexual acts? why of course...and when this encrypted text is performed, is its intended meaning intact on the other side...i believe not...at least not in whole, perhaps at times in part...
coitus interupt us...i must regroup now...for there is more to say but i fear the length and width of my discourse may soon sound of the gold trumpet and this is not music i have ever enjoyed...a radio edit i prefered...
all sew...dear gwen now wears little while crooning the big apple and i am easily diverted...what does she mean by the gyrations of her hips and the pursing of her lips...surely not what i am thinking...she wants my attention, my money...i want her affection, her honey...
thats the buzz
bee cool
