Author Topic: Scarlett Johansson  (Read 71259 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

polkablues

  • Child of Myth
  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 7037
  • Respect: +1755
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #300 on: December 07, 2005, 06:31:59 PM »
0
"gladiatrix"

Did it just get warm in here?
Now you're in the *spoiler* place.

Reinhold

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2452
  • Respect: +3
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #301 on: December 11, 2005, 03:32:53 AM »
0
"gladiatrix"

Did it just get warm in here?

i think you found the pee spot in the xixax pool.
Obviously what you are doing right now is called (in my upcoming book of psychology at least) validation. I think it's a normal thing to do. People will reply, say anything, and then you're gonna do what you were subconsciently thinking of doing all along.

ono

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 4209
  • ...
  • Respect: +180
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #302 on: January 09, 2006, 10:21:01 PM »
0
Interview Magazine, November 2005.  A fluff interview, but that's hardly the point.








Naz

  • The Call to Adventure
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Respect: 0
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #303 on: February 03, 2006, 01:01:01 PM »
0
I personally don't think she's more talented than any other good actress. She just doesn't seem like a person who plays in 'teenage-movies', but she plays more serious roles which I like. I think she needs to practise on her facial expressions, though.

Thrindle

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1077
  • Respect: +3
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #304 on: February 04, 2006, 05:15:27 AM »
0
I personally don't think she's more talented than any other good actress. She just doesn't seem like a person who plays in 'teenage-movies', but she plays more serious roles which I like. I think she needs to practise on her facial expressions, though.
Crack kills.
Classic.

MacGuffin

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 22985
  • Respect: +638
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #305 on: February 07, 2006, 11:54:26 AM »
0


Johansson, Knightley Bare All for Magazine

With award season still under way, Scarlett Johansson and Keira Knightley are exchanging ballgowns for birthday suits.

Under the artful eye of photographer Annie Leibovitz, the starlets posed nude for the cover of Vanity Fair magazine's yearly Hollywood issue, to be released Wednesday.

Fashion superstar Tom Ford also appears on the cover photo, though he stuck with a more traditional suit one of black fabric.

Ford, the issue's guest art director, said he hadn't planned on becoming part of his own project, but he stepped in when "Wedding Crashers" star Rachel McAdams, 29, backed out.

"She did want to do it, and then when she was on the set I think she felt uncomfortable, and I didn't want to make anybody feel uncomfortable" Ford said Tuesday on ABC's "Good Morning America."

Other Hollywood stars weren't difficult to persuade, Ford said.

"A lot of women actually, a couple of men, too, wanted to take their clothes off," he said. "These are such beautiful people, beautiful women, and who doesn't want to see a bit of them."

Angelina Jolie also got naked for the Hollywood issue, posing in a bathtub. Another shot depicts a fully clothed George Clooney as a director filming a large cast of women wearing skin-tone underwear.

For the cover photo, Knightley, 20, was photographed sitting sideways, with legs and arms carefully placed. The 21-year-old Johansson, draped over Ford's leg, is somewhat more exposed readers who open the fold-out cover will see her bare buttocks.

Knightley is currently nominated for a best actress Oscar for her performance in "Pride & Prejudice." Johansson co-starred this year in Woody Allen's "Match Point."
“Don't think about making art, just get it done. Let everyone else decide if it's good or bad, whether they love it or hate it. While they are deciding, make even more art.” - Andy Warhol


Skeleton FilmWorks

Fernando

  • satan's little helper
  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2227
  • Respect: +226
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #306 on: February 07, 2006, 12:08:50 PM »
0
I think is safe to say many many ppl here will get that.

:yabbse-faints:

squints

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2238
  • Respect: +75
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #307 on: February 07, 2006, 12:10:19 PM »
0
Tom Ford is a lucky fuck
“The myth by no means finds its adequate objectification in the spoken word. The structure of the scenes and the visible imagery reveal a deeper wisdom than the poet himself is able to put into words and concepts” – Friedrich Nietzsche

Ravi

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 4865
  • Respect: +88
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #308 on: February 07, 2006, 10:12:03 PM »
0
Ford, the issue's guest art director, said he hadn't planned on becoming part of his own project, but he stepped in when "Wedding Crashers" star Rachel McAdams, 29, backed out.

...and GT cries himself to sleep.

Gold Trumpet

  • The Master of Three Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 5767
  • Respect: +151
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #309 on: February 08, 2006, 04:32:30 AM »
0
Ford, the issue's guest art director, said he hadn't planned on becoming part of his own project, but he stepped in when "Wedding Crashers" star Rachel McAdams, 29, backed out.

...and GT cries himself to sleep.

Hah, I'm fickle. Mcadams dropped off my radar with the overhype of Wedding Crashers and the awfulness of Red Eye.

Knightley's more my speed. She likely swears without vanity issues. Plus she's no longer second kettle to Natalie Portman. She's even better. Proof is the Oscar nomination and lack of pretension.

modage

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 10761
  • Respect: +698
    • Floating Heads
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #310 on: February 08, 2006, 07:49:53 AM »
0
i don't think oscar nominations are proof of anything.  she was badass in domino though.
Christopher Nolan's directive was clear to everyone in the cast and crew: Use CGI only as a last resort.

MacGuffin

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 22985
  • Respect: +638
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #311 on: February 08, 2006, 11:22:27 AM »
0
i don't think oscar nominations are proof of anything. 

If it is, Portman got hers first.
“Don't think about making art, just get it done. Let everyone else decide if it's good or bad, whether they love it or hate it. While they are deciding, make even more art.” - Andy Warhol


Skeleton FilmWorks

Gold Trumpet

  • The Master of Three Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 5767
  • Respect: +151
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #312 on: February 08, 2006, 04:08:07 PM »
0
i don't think oscar nominations are proof of anything. 

If it is, Portman got hers first.

Oh yea. Even my arguments are fickle.

©brad

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 4504
  • Respect: +216
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #313 on: February 08, 2006, 05:23:19 PM »
0
scarlett is too hot for words. there are no words that do her justice. none i tell yah.

eward

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2815
  • Respect: +11
Re: Scarlett Johansson
« Reply #314 on: February 08, 2006, 07:00:49 PM »
0
those ladies need some sun

 

DMCA & Copyright | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy