Author Topic: Beatles or Rollingstones  (Read 6657 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

moonshiner

  • The Vision Quest
  • **
  • Posts: 279
  • Respect: 0
Beatles or Rollingstones
« on: September 11, 2003, 09:14:36 AM »
0
an enigmatic character once said that every band fell into a category, Beatles or Rollingstones? with argument structure defined, i'll start

Radiohead=Beatles
the rumble of the train trails off to infinity, a place where no one goes anymore

JC, no not that one

SoNowThen

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 4536
  • Respect: +9
    • 24/30 Cinema
Beatles or Rollingstones
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2003, 09:23:30 AM »
0
Vines
Black Crowes            = Rolling Stones
Ryan Adams
Those who say that the totalitarian state of the Soviet Union was not "real" Marxism also cannot admit that one simple feature of Marxism makes totalitarianism necessary:  the rejection of civil society. Since civil society is the sphere of private activity, its abolition and replacement by political society means that nothing private remains. That is already the essence of totalitarianism; and the moralistic practice of the trendy Left, which regards everything as political and sometimes reveals its hostility to free speech, does nothing to contradict this implication.

When those who hated capital and consumption (and Jews) in the 20th century murdered some hundred million people, and the poster children for the struggle against international capitalism and America are now fanatical Islamic terrorists, this puts recent enthusiasts in an awkward position. Most of them are too dense and shameless to appreciate it, and far too many are taken in by the moralistic and paternalistic rhetoric of the Left.

ShanghaiOrange

  • The Magic Flight
  • ****
  • Posts: 635
  • Respect: +6
Beatles or Rollingstones
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2003, 09:25:13 AM »
0
Elvis = Rolling Stones
Last five films (theater)
-The Da Vinci Code: *
-Thank You For Smoking: ***
-Silent Hill: ***1/2 (high)
-Happy Together: ***1/2
-Slither: **

Last five films (video)
-Solaris: ***1/2
-Cobra Verde: ***1/2
-My Best Fiend: **1/2
-Days of Heaven: ****
-The Thin Red Line: ***

SoNowThen

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 4536
  • Respect: +9
    • 24/30 Cinema
Beatles or Rollingstones
« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2003, 09:28:37 AM »
0
Quote from: ShanghaiOrange
Elvis = Rolling Stones


no

Chuck Berry + Muddy Waters = Rolling Stones
Those who say that the totalitarian state of the Soviet Union was not "real" Marxism also cannot admit that one simple feature of Marxism makes totalitarianism necessary:  the rejection of civil society. Since civil society is the sphere of private activity, its abolition and replacement by political society means that nothing private remains. That is already the essence of totalitarianism; and the moralistic practice of the trendy Left, which regards everything as political and sometimes reveals its hostility to free speech, does nothing to contradict this implication.

When those who hated capital and consumption (and Jews) in the 20th century murdered some hundred million people, and the poster children for the struggle against international capitalism and America are now fanatical Islamic terrorists, this puts recent enthusiasts in an awkward position. Most of them are too dense and shameless to appreciate it, and far too many are taken in by the moralistic and paternalistic rhetoric of the Left.

Sigur Rós

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2794
  • The H.W. of Xixax...
  • Respect: +7
Re: Beatles or Rollingstones
« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2003, 09:46:01 AM »
0
Quote from: moonshiner
an enigmatic character once said that every band fell into a category, Beatles or Rollingstones? with argument structure defined, i'll start


Well, I don't agree with this guy!

Dirk

  • The Meeting with the Goddess
  • ***
  • Posts: 434
  • Respect: +5
    • http://www.greenpeace.org
Re: Beatles or Rollingstones
« Reply #5 on: September 11, 2003, 10:37:51 AM »
0
Quote from: Sigur
Quote from: moonshiner
an enigmatic character once said that every band fell into a category, Beatles or Rollingstones? with argument structure defined, i'll start


Well, I don't agree with this guy!


Yeah, that dude is whack.
At wave level, everything exists as a contradiction. Everything is existing in more than one stage/place at any given moment. Everything must move/vibrate and constantly change to exist. Everything, including buildings, mountains, oceans and thoughts.

AlguienEstolamiPantalones

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1715
  • Respect: 0
Re: Beatles or Rollingstones
« Reply #6 on: September 11, 2003, 11:15:36 AM »
0
Quote from: moonshiner
an enigmatic character once said that every band fell into a category, Beatles or Rollingstones? with argument structure defined, i'll start

Radiohead=Beatles


apples and oranges


but the stones lasted a few more years, i would say after exile they were pretty much done, but they still had a few great moments in between sad moments

AlguienEstolamiPantalones

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1715
  • Respect: 0
Beatles or Rollingstones
« Reply #7 on: September 11, 2003, 11:17:28 AM »
0
Quote from: SoNowThen
Quote from: ShanghaiOrange
Elvis = Rolling Stones


no

Chuck Berry + Muddy Waters = Rolling Stones


those two and motown and you got the stones they would take motown licks right and left and cover motown songs all the time, under my thumb was a out and out motown rip off not the lyrics the music

but your right

moonshiner

  • The Vision Quest
  • **
  • Posts: 279
  • Respect: 0
Beatles or Rollingstones
« Reply #8 on: September 11, 2003, 01:09:54 PM »
0
sigur ros = beatles

white stripes = rollingstones
the rumble of the train trails off to infinity, a place where no one goes anymore

JC, no not that one

SoNowThen

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 4536
  • Respect: +9
    • 24/30 Cinema
Beatles or Rollingstones
« Reply #9 on: September 11, 2003, 01:16:49 PM »
0
Quote from: AlguienEstolamiPantalones
Quote from: SoNowThen
Quote from: ShanghaiOrange
Elvis = Rolling Stones


no

Chuck Berry + Muddy Waters = Rolling Stones


those two and motown and you got the stones they would take motown licks right and left and cover motown songs all the time, under my thumb was a out and out motown rip off not the lyrics the music

but your right


You're right, my mathematician friend, I shall now provide the ultimate formula:

Chuck Berry + Muddy Waters
_________________________                        = Stones

The Temptations
Those who say that the totalitarian state of the Soviet Union was not "real" Marxism also cannot admit that one simple feature of Marxism makes totalitarianism necessary:  the rejection of civil society. Since civil society is the sphere of private activity, its abolition and replacement by political society means that nothing private remains. That is already the essence of totalitarianism; and the moralistic practice of the trendy Left, which regards everything as political and sometimes reveals its hostility to free speech, does nothing to contradict this implication.

When those who hated capital and consumption (and Jews) in the 20th century murdered some hundred million people, and the poster children for the struggle against international capitalism and America are now fanatical Islamic terrorists, this puts recent enthusiasts in an awkward position. Most of them are too dense and shameless to appreciate it, and far too many are taken in by the moralistic and paternalistic rhetoric of the Left.

moonshiner

  • The Vision Quest
  • **
  • Posts: 279
  • Respect: 0
Beatles or Rollingstones
« Reply #10 on: September 11, 2003, 02:01:54 PM »
0
don't think of this analogy as a direct comparison, Beatles or Rollingstones, to me it's thought-out pop experimentation vs. raw rock 'n roll.
the rumble of the train trails off to infinity, a place where no one goes anymore

JC, no not that one

AlguienEstolamiPantalones

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1715
  • Respect: 0
Beatles or Rollingstones
« Reply #11 on: September 11, 2003, 02:35:25 PM »
0
Quote from: moonshiner


white stripes = rollingstones


::Looks for pistol:: what the fuck did you say

jack white is a kid who learned about the blues from indie rockers in the 90's,  he just so happens to have more talent then jon spencer, but thats who he learned about the blues from

but the stones ???? are you kidding me some of his new shit sounds like led zep with out jimmy page and bonam just robert plant

AlguienEstolamiPantalones

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1715
  • Respect: 0
Beatles or Rollingstones
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2003, 02:37:29 PM »
0
the wu tang clan plus the charlie daniels band plus brian adams plus  chuck norris = jack johnson

SoNowThen

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 4536
  • Respect: +9
    • 24/30 Cinema
Beatles or Rollingstones
« Reply #13 on: September 11, 2003, 02:45:42 PM »
0
please minus brian adams from the jack johnson equation


brian adams...
*shudders*
another "proud" Canadian addition to the world
Those who say that the totalitarian state of the Soviet Union was not "real" Marxism also cannot admit that one simple feature of Marxism makes totalitarianism necessary:  the rejection of civil society. Since civil society is the sphere of private activity, its abolition and replacement by political society means that nothing private remains. That is already the essence of totalitarianism; and the moralistic practice of the trendy Left, which regards everything as political and sometimes reveals its hostility to free speech, does nothing to contradict this implication.

When those who hated capital and consumption (and Jews) in the 20th century murdered some hundred million people, and the poster children for the struggle against international capitalism and America are now fanatical Islamic terrorists, this puts recent enthusiasts in an awkward position. Most of them are too dense and shameless to appreciate it, and far too many are taken in by the moralistic and paternalistic rhetoric of the Left.

phil marlowe

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +1
Beatles or Rollingstones
« Reply #14 on: September 11, 2003, 02:47:59 PM »
0
Quote from: SoNowThen
please minus brian adams from the jack johnson equation


brian adams...
*shudders*
another "proud" Canadian addition to the world

HEY BRYAN ADAMS IS MY CHILDHOOD HERO

 

DMCA & Copyright | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy