Author Topic: Inglourious Basterds [sic]  (Read 105433 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

hedwig

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2144
  • Lazy bones ain't got no time to waste away
  • Respect: +2
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #135 on: October 17, 2008, 10:27:20 PM »
0
I refuse to use the official spelling
i'm with you.

until I've been given a good enough reason to do so.
not gonna happen.


Fernando

  • satan's little helper
  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2234
  • Respect: +230
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #136 on: October 31, 2008, 12:36:08 PM »
0
what a :shock: !!

Jackson joins Bastards
from: joblo.com

You know it was just a matter of time - Sam Jackson has joined the cast of Quentin Tarantino's INGLORIOUS BASTARDS. OK well Jackson won't seen on screen alongside Brad Pitt but he'll instead serve as the narrator of the piece where he'll read lines like:

"Needless to say, once the Basterds got heard about him, he never got there."

"For in the other world, the gods only respect the ones they test first. Well Sgt., this is your test. And the gods are watching."

It just wouldn't be a Tarantino film without just a little Sam Jackson in there so I'm glad he's found a place. Also joining the cast is Maggie Cheung who will play Madame Mimieux, the French owner of a cinema where a good deal of action takes place. As The Playlist reports, it is slightly odd that Tarantino cast a Chinese woman to play a French woman but Mimieux speaks fluent French so perhaps it won't be as big a problem as we imagine. BASTARDS is currently shooting for a premiere at the 2009 Cannes Film Festival.

jtm

  • The Ultimate Boon
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
  • Respect: +2
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #137 on: November 04, 2008, 02:15:55 AM »
0
spoilers or whatever:

so, i finally read the screenplay for this last night. what the fuck is up with him changing the course of history?!?!

besides that, it was alright i guess.

Pas

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 3429
  • Respect: +10
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #138 on: November 05, 2008, 05:54:03 PM »
0
spoilers or whatever:

so, i finally read the screenplay for this last night. what the fuck is up with him changing the course of history?!?!

besides that, it was alright i guess.

God please I know this is light but still...SPOILER ?!

jtm

  • The Ultimate Boon
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
  • Respect: +2
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #139 on: November 07, 2008, 12:09:33 AM »
0
you guys crack me up. you give people shit for not putting spoiler warnings in there. AND you give people shit for putting spoiler warnings in there... is there a handbook out there i should read on the subject!?

anyways, i put the spoiler warning there (and if you notice, i put" whatever" after it, meaning it maybe didn't need it.) because the fact that he changed the course of history is A MAJOR PART OF THE FILM...

btw,

SPOILER
admin edit: MOVIE RUINING SPOILERS



QT loves the smelly feet!!!





if you read that, it's your own fault.
« Last Edit: November 09, 2008, 02:09:06 AM by jtm »

modage

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 10785
  • Respect: +727
    • Floating Heads
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #140 on: November 07, 2008, 05:03:09 PM »
0
i read it, it was my own fault.  i have tried to help out the rest of you.  learn from my mistakes.
Christopher Nolan's directive was clear to everyone in the cast and crew: Use CGI only as a last resort.

Stefen

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 7777
  • smh
  • Respect: +191
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #141 on: November 07, 2008, 05:34:22 PM »
0
this is bullshit!
Let's go to a motel. We don't have to do anything -- we could just swim.

jtm

  • The Ultimate Boon
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
  • Respect: +2
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #142 on: November 07, 2008, 10:35:02 PM »
0
damn!  sorry mod... i guess i should have made the severity of my spoiler more known to you guys.

i know how tempting it can be to read spoilers, even when you know you shouldn't... i've done the same thing many times. 

Stefen

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 7777
  • smh
  • Respect: +191
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #143 on: November 08, 2008, 09:50:45 AM »
0
you just ruined my life!!!

*jumps out 80th story window sans parachute*
Let's go to a motel. We don't have to do anything -- we could just swim.

Pozer

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2289
  • Respect: +139
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #144 on: November 08, 2008, 02:40:36 PM »
0
i just don't see the point of putting the spoiler temptation out there at this point when anyone who would want the movie ruined for them can read the script like you did.

*throws jtm's post out 80th story window sans spoiler warning*

jtm

  • The Ultimate Boon
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
  • Respect: +2
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #145 on: November 09, 2008, 12:22:11 AM »
0
the point, poser, was to show my reasoning for giving a spoiler in regards to quentin changing history.


EDIT: i've removed my "movie ruining" spoiler.

all you people with no will power can now sleep safely tonight.

cowboykurtis

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1671
  • Respect: +8
...your excuses are your own...

modage

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 10785
  • Respect: +727
    • Floating Heads
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #147 on: November 14, 2008, 05:51:12 PM »
0
all you people with no will power can now sleep safely tonight.



what do you mean, "you people"?
Christopher Nolan's directive was clear to everyone in the cast and crew: Use CGI only as a last resort.

Stefen

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 7777
  • smh
  • Respect: +191
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #148 on: November 14, 2008, 05:55:09 PM »
0
I guess he's still on the coke. That's the only way to explain the fact that he's still dressing in country and western garb.
Let's go to a motel. We don't have to do anything -- we could just swim.

Pozer

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2289
  • Respect: +139
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #149 on: November 14, 2008, 06:18:14 PM »
0
I guess he's still on the coke. That's the only way to explain the fact that he's still dressing in country and western garb.

it's the exact same garb as



 

DMCA & Copyright | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy