Author Topic: Inglourious Basterds [sic]  (Read 103005 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SiliasRuby

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 3071
  • Spits Hyperbole Like Nobody's Business
  • Respect: +2
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #195 on: February 11, 2009, 08:50:39 PM »
0
I don't care what none of yall muthafuckas say, I'm looking forward to this....

Okay enough of my Samuel L. Jackson impersonation.
The Beatles know Jesus Christ has returned to Earth and is in Los Angeles.

When you are getting fucked by the big corporations remember to use a condom.

There was a FISH in the perkalater!!!

My Collection

Stefen

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 7777
  • smh
  • Respect: +190
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #196 on: February 11, 2009, 10:12:41 PM »
0
That's just a teaser trailer. It gives a taste. I still think it looks like fun.
Let's go to a motel. We don't have to do anything -- we could just swim.

polkablues

  • Child of Myth
  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 7038
  • Respect: +1758
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #197 on: February 11, 2009, 11:22:07 PM »
0
It's starting to look like Eli Roth has been too big of an influence on Quentin Tarantino, rather than the other way around.
Now you're in the *spoiler* place.

md

  • The Ultimate Boon
  • ***
  • Posts: 469
  • Respect: +41
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #198 on: February 12, 2009, 12:15:29 AM »
0
oh god that last line of dialogue is bad...so bad even Pitt knows it.
"look hard at what pleases you and even harder at what doesn't" ~ carolyn forche

MacGuffin

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 22985
  • Respect: +638
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #199 on: February 12, 2009, 12:17:49 AM »
0
I know it's only one clip of him, but Brad Pitt is lacking some much needed gravitas and bite. I feel like that last scalp line should have goosebumped me silly, but I felt nothing.

In the script, it came off as what you wanted.
“Don't think about making art, just get it done. Let everyone else decide if it's good or bad, whether they love it or hate it. While they are deciding, make even more art.” - Andy Warhol


Skeleton FilmWorks

Kal

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 3283
  • Success is not a goal, it's a byproduct.
  • Respect: +190
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #200 on: February 12, 2009, 12:34:20 AM »
0
I also remember getting super excited with the Kill Bill teaser and for a reason. The music, the visuals, the action sequences, the colors, the characters, everything made it look very cool. I remember how awesome that was and its been years. This one I forgot it already, and it made me feel nothing.

Check out the KB trailer here so you remember what I'm talking about.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBYGQZQKb7k


Still, I hope that teaser is just bullshit but the final thing will be awesome. We'll see...


Gold Trumpet

  • The Master of Three Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 5767
  • Respect: +151
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #201 on: February 12, 2009, 12:49:20 AM »
0
The Kill Bill teaser is more of a full length trailer. It shows numerous things that happen in the film. The only difference is that the scenes are shortened in length so it looks like a teaser, but no teaser gives away that much of the film. I saw most of the coolest moments in the film in that trailer.

With Basterds I saw just a few action sequences on top of the one scene it focused on. I think Tarantino finally made a teaser trailer here.

picolas

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 1752
  • Respect: +103
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #202 on: February 12, 2009, 01:09:05 AM »
0
It's starting to look like Eli Roth has been too big of an influence on Quentin Tarantino, rather than the other way around.
yes. i cannot stand the sight of him. and the absurdly generic rock music?? whuut? the final line is so odd. i don't know whether to blame tarantino or pitt... but i'm sure tarantino saw that as the big final trailer line (alright?!) when he wrote it, then he shot it and stubbornly clung to it despite it clearly being awkward.

Gold Trumpet

  • The Master of Three Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 5767
  • Respect: +151
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #203 on: February 12, 2009, 01:17:36 AM »
0
One thing I will say is that I'm not sure about the casting of Brad Pitt. If he's meant to play tough, intimidating and all around bad ass, it may not work for him. He reminds me of Colin Farrell in that he has a macho physicality, but it's seared with a little goofiness. Pitt epitomized Achilles in Troy, but mainly because he epitomized the look and didn't have too many lines outside of the bland. He also did well in Fight Club for the purpose of his role, but the look worked for him and he was mainly relegated to a supporting role. Tarantino will make him carry more intricate dialogue and make him make more bizarre things come off as cool and tough.

private witt

  • The Meeting with the Goddess
  • ***
  • Posts: 347
  • Respect: 0
    • ANTIPHON FiLMS
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #204 on: February 12, 2009, 02:04:57 AM »
0
One thing I will say is that I'm not sure about the casting of Brad Pitt.

That's one sentence you will never hear an executive producer utter.
"If you work in marketing or advertising, kill yourself.  You contribute nothing of value to the human race, just do us all a favor and end your fucking life."  ~Bill Hicks

Sleepless

  • The Master of Three Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1782
  • I told you I would eat you
  • Respect: +329
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #205 on: February 12, 2009, 04:11:57 AM »
0
It's Tarantino. It is what it is. I'm interested in seeing him do a non-contemporary piece. Having read the script a while back I don't remember everything absolutely, but like all QT this is going to be an exercise in style over substance. It may not be great art, but it sure as hell will be entertaining.

The thing that bugs me is that they're sticking with the clumsy misspelling. Why?

Pas

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 3429
  • Respect: +10
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #206 on: February 12, 2009, 06:21:31 AM »
0
Oh god this looks like utter crap. Hopefully it will be extremely bad and Brad Pitt won't kill my new moustache look. Fucking asshole.

modage

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 10761
  • Respect: +698
    • Floating Heads
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #207 on: February 12, 2009, 08:10:21 AM »
0
IN THE YEAR 2009
BRAD PITT WILL
KILL HITLER
Christopher Nolan's directive was clear to everyone in the cast and crew: Use CGI only as a last resort.

pete

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 5510
  • freakin huge
  • Respect: +361
    • my site
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #208 on: February 12, 2009, 12:17:07 PM »
0
it looks fun enough.  the biggest problem is how exploitative it is, once I get over it I think I'll enjoy it.  it doesn't look much like a "war movie" though.
“Tragedy is a close-up; comedy, a long shot.”
- Buster Keaton

Stefen

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 7777
  • smh
  • Respect: +190
Re: Inglourious Basterds [sic]
« Reply #209 on: February 12, 2009, 12:27:37 PM »
0
I just want it to be good. Not just fun, but good. I mean, shitty movies can be fun. Tarantino seems to just be coasting along trying to be cool. It doesn't help that he seems to have his penis parked inside Eli Roth.

I want it to be good.
Let's go to a motel. We don't have to do anything -- we could just swim.

 

DMCA & Copyright | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy