Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14   Go Down

Author Topic: Terrence Malick  (Read 42624 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

edison

  • The Return Threshold
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
  • Respect: +2
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #105 on: December 08, 2004, 11:49:04 PM »
0
Logged

UncleJoey

  • The Vision Quest
  • **
  • Posts: 221
  • Respect: +1
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #106 on: December 09, 2004, 12:04:12 AM »
0
Oh man . . . I can't wait. Malick rules.
Logged
Well, I've got news for you pal, you ain't leadin' but two things: Jack and shit . . . and Jack just left town.

MacGuffin

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 22985
  • Respect: +641
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #107 on: December 09, 2004, 12:07:50 AM »
0
That would be good in it's own thread in the Grapevine.
Logged
“Don't think about making art, just get it done. Let everyone else decide if it's good or bad, whether they love it or hate it. While they are deciding, make even more art.” - Andy Warhol


Skeleton FilmWorks

life_boy

  • The Ultimate Boon
  • ***
  • Posts: 581
  • Christmas has always smelled like oranges to me.
  • Respect: +1
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #108 on: February 02, 2005, 11:52:06 AM »
0
I haven't seen The Thin Red Line since the original theater run back in late 1998/ early 1999.  I remember breathtaking John Toll cinematography and I do remember liking the film, but at the time I was a little immature and easily persuaded by conventional end-of-the-year awards and critical praise.  Is it worth seeing again?  Does the later-Malick hold up to multiple viewings like his older stuff seems to?
Logged

kotte

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2051
  • camera assistant. camera operator. carnivore.
  • Respect: +9
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #109 on: February 02, 2005, 11:57:04 AM »
0
I went to see it with a girl. We made out.

She dumped me the next day.
Logged

cine

  • Pretttttyyy, Pretttyyyyy Pretty Good
  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 5553
  • Respect: +283
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #110 on: February 02, 2005, 11:59:57 AM »
0
Quote from: kotte
I went to see it with a girl. We made out.

She dumped me the next day.

Why? Is it as deplorable as Seinfeld making out with his date during Schindlers List?
Logged

Pubrick

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 12170
  • on the not-face of it
  • Respect: +780
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #111 on: February 02, 2005, 12:02:17 PM »
0
Quote from: cinephile
Why? Is it as deplorable as Seinfeld making out with his date during Schindlers List?

i don't think the two events were connected.
Logged
under the paving stones.

cine

  • Pretttttyyy, Pretttyyyyy Pretty Good
  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 5553
  • Respect: +283
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #112 on: February 02, 2005, 12:16:40 PM »
0
Quote from: Pubrick
Quote from: cinephile
Why? Is it as deplorable as Seinfeld making out with his date during Schindlers List?

i don't think the two events were connected.

well they should've been.. I wouldn't let kotte make out with me during a movie like that either.
Logged

SHAFTR

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2337
  • You brought two too many
  • Respect: +4
    • rmlumley.com
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #113 on: February 09, 2005, 07:11:11 PM »
0
Quote from: flagpolespecial
Quote from: SHAFTR
I just saw Days of Heaven.  Wow, that film looks good.  My only gripe about the film is sometimes I feel it felt like a 90 minute montage, instead of letting the story take over.  There were very few "scenes".  I know this works with the girl remembering the experience, but I still wanted more.


i think if you feel this way about a malick movie you don't really like malick movies.


No, I do like Malick movies.  I just sometimes wish his films could be more narrative based while maintaining his poetic style.
Logged
"Talking shit about a pretty sunset
Blanketing opinions that i'll probably regret soon"

cine

  • Pretttttyyy, Pretttyyyyy Pretty Good
  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 5553
  • Respect: +283
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #114 on: February 09, 2005, 07:25:16 PM »
0
Quote from: SHAFTR
I just sometimes wish his films could be more narrative based while maintaining his poetic style.

can't films be narrative through their poetic style?
Logged

eward

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2959
  • Respect: +87
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #115 on: February 09, 2005, 08:58:33 PM »
0
yes, they can be.
Logged
"Do you laugh at jealousy?"

"No, I don't even laugh at seasickness! I happen to regard jealousy as the seasickness of passion."

Myxo

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1768
  • Respect: +29
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #116 on: February 09, 2005, 11:51:03 PM »
0
They can also be narrative through poetic style and boring as hell.

Thin Red Line bored me to tears.

Looking forward to New World though.
Logged

Pastor Parsley

  • The Vision Quest
  • **
  • Posts: 134
  • Respect: 0
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #117 on: February 17, 2005, 09:54:53 AM »
0
Malick is easily one of my favorite directors but I really have to be in a certain mood to sit down and watch any of his films.  Thin Red line is my least favorites partly due to the voice-over.  Some of those shots have a stillness that would be great with a little silence.
Logged

eward

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2959
  • Respect: +87
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #118 on: February 17, 2005, 11:48:25 AM »
0
i love the voice-overs, personally.  i love how non-specific they are.  often you don't know who the fuck is talking.  it's everyones thoughts being expressed.  but of course we all know that.
Logged
"Do you laugh at jealousy?"

"No, I don't even laugh at seasickness! I happen to regard jealousy as the seasickness of passion."

RegularKarate

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 6051
  • Respect: +213
    • http://www.livejournal.com/users/regularkarate/
Re: Terrence Malick
« Reply #119 on: February 17, 2005, 01:23:04 PM »
0
The voice overs suck... they almost ruin the movie.

I have heard (can anyone confirm?) that the voice overs were not originally intended to be included in the movie.  That would have made it a million times better.  The film is so visually amazing that the voice overs make it like dancing with a beautiful, classy woman while some drunk, ugly chick tries to pull down your pants for a quick handjob.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14   Go Up
 

DMCA & Copyright | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy