Author Topic: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA  (Read 31329 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kellen

  • The Vision Quest
  • **
  • Posts: 299
  • Respect: +60
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #90 on: January 08, 2014, 07:00:52 PM »
0
scorsese letter

Dearest Francesca,

Iím writing this letter to you about the future. Iím looking at it through the lens of my world. Through the lens of cinema, which has been at the center of that world.

For the last few years, Iíve realized that the idea of cinema that I grew up with, thatís there in the movies Iíve been showing you since you were a child, and that was thriving when I started making pictures, is coming to a close. Iím not referring to the films that have already been made. Iím referring to the ones that are to come.

I donít mean to be despairing. Iím not writing these words in a spirit of defeat. On the contrary, I think the future is bright.

We always knew that the movies were a business, and that the art of cinema was made possible because it aligned with business conditions. None of us who started in the 60s and 70s had any illusions on that front. We knew that we would have to work hard to protect what we loved. We also knew that we might have to go through some rough periods. And I suppose we realized, on some level, that we might face a time when every inconvenient or unpredictable element in the moviemaking process would be minimized, maybe even eliminated. The most unpredictable element of all? Cinema. And the people who make it.

I donít want to repeat what has been said and written by so many others before me, about all the changes in the business, and Iím heartened by the exceptions to the overall trend in moviemaking Ė Wes Anderson, Richard Linklater, David Fincher, Alexander Payne, the Coen Brothers, James Gray and Paul Thomas Anderson are all managing to get pictures made, and Paul not only got The Master made in 70mm, he even got it shown that way in a few cities. Anyone who cares about cinema should be thankful.

And Iím also moved by the artists who are continuing to get their pictures made all over the world, in France, in South Korea, in England, in Japan, in Africa. Itís getting harder all the time, but theyíre getting the films done.

But I donít think Iím being pessimistic when I say that the art of cinema and the movie business are now at a crossroads. Audio-visual entertainment and what we know as cinema Ė moving pictures conceived by individuals Ė appear to be headed in different directions. In the future, youíll probably see less and less of what we recognize as cinema on multiplex screens and more and more of it in smaller theaters, online, and, I suppose, in spaces and circumstances that I canít predict.

So why is the future so bright? Because for the very first time in the history of the art form, movies really can be made for very little money. This was unheard of when I was growing up, and extremely low budget movies have always been the exception rather than the rule. Now, itís the reverse. You can get beautiful images with affordable cameras. You can record sound. You can edit and mix and color-correct at home. This has all come to pass.

But with all the attention paid to the machinery of making movies and to the advances in technology that have led to this revolution in moviemaking, there is one important thing to remember: the tools donít make the movie, you make the movie. Itís freeing to pick up a camera and start shooting and then put it together with Final Cut Pro. Making a movie Ė the one you need to make Ė is something else. There are no shortcuts.

If John Cassavetes, my friend and mentor, were alive today, he would certainly be using all the equipment thatís available. But he would be saying the same things he always said Ė you have to be absolutely dedicated to the work, you have to give everything of yourself, and you have to protect the spark of connection that drove you to make the picture in the first place. You have to protect it with your life. In the past, because making movies was so expensive, we had to protect against exhaustion and compromise. In the future, youíll have to steel yourself against something else: the temptation to go with the flow, and allow the movie to drift and float away.

This isnít just a matter of cinema. There are no shortcuts to anything. Iím not saying that everything has to be difficult. Iím saying that the voice that sparks you is your voice Ė thatís the inner light, as the Quakers put it.

Thatís you. Thatís the truth.

All my love,

Dad

Reelist

  • Shoutbox Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
  • Respect: +965
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #91 on: January 08, 2014, 08:05:39 PM »
0
Who wrote that? I couldn't read between the lines
You can go to places in the world with pudding. That. Is. Funny.

Lottery

  • The Return Threshold
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
  • You're Dead!
  • Respect: +444
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #92 on: January 08, 2014, 08:08:42 PM »
0
That guy that plays Van Gogh in Kurosawa's Dreams. You know, that one dude who plays the upset husband in Taxi Driver.

Reelist

  • Shoutbox Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
  • Respect: +965
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #93 on: January 08, 2014, 08:58:21 PM »
0
John Stamos?
You can go to places in the world with pudding. That. Is. Funny.

Mel

  • The Meeting with the Goddess
  • ***
  • Posts: 444
  • Edgy TV show-watching Russian bodybuilder cartoon.
  • Respect: +168
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #94 on: January 10, 2014, 03:19:08 PM »
0
Unless you're Paul Thomas Anderson... - sentence that David Poland likes to use, when speaking with his guests. Last two I remember:

Time - 27:20


Time - 29:30


I remember hearing few others, but don't feel like searching for them.

edit: Another one:

Time - 17:45
Simple mind - simple pleasures...

Pubrick

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 12170
  • Lynchian identity mystery
  • Respect: +769
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #95 on: January 15, 2014, 05:59:15 AM »
0
those first two instances are kind of cringey. it's hard to tell if he is saying PTA's long shots are excessive or not and so the poor sods being interviewed just laugh and admit that it's true without stating whether that's a good thing or not. actually jake g says "unless it works", which at least adds context to the interviewer's forced reference. still a bit embarrassing.

it's more clear in the zemeckis interview that the dude likes PTA, but not clear if Z-man gives a shit. it's funny that he says "i've never done that".. sometimes it's easy to think of auteurs as some kind of struggling artist, but here's a dude who has made some legit huge flops that brought studios down (well, one) and he still can't conceive of what it's like to be an "independent" filmmaker. he has powerful friends that much is certain.

don't know who david poland is but i'm not really keen to hear any other time he name drops PTA. keep an eye on his obsession in case it develops into something creepy but right now it's pretty meaningless. all we can draw from this is that he has PTA tourettes and it's awkward seeing his interview subjects have to deal with it.
endless 'nothing is what it seems'-isms

Kellen

  • The Vision Quest
  • **
  • Posts: 299
  • Respect: +60
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #96 on: January 16, 2014, 07:23:09 PM »
0
Around the 44/45 min mark.

Scorsese talks about how independent filmmakers aren't really supported now like they were in the 70s.  He mentions the "Andersons" to which Charlie says "Wes" and Martin agrees then quickly says also "Paul Thomas".  He also brings up Alexander Payne and the Coens.

modage

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 10761
  • Respect: +698
    • Floating Heads
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #97 on: February 27, 2014, 11:35:08 AM »
0
ATTN: True Detective Fans

Daily Beast: It still tickles me that Paul W.S. Anderson has the same name as Paul Thomas Anderson, one of our greatest filmmakers.
Cary Fukunaga: It really is the perfect example of extremesójust use the Paul Anderson scale! P.T. Anderson is one of myóif not myófavorite directors. Him and Cuaron. And Audiard.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/02/26/true-detective-director-cary-fukunaga-s-journey-from-pro-snowboarder-to-hollywood-s-most-wanted.html
Christopher Nolan's directive was clear to everyone in the cast and crew: Use CGI only as a last resort.

Kellen

  • The Vision Quest
  • **
  • Posts: 299
  • Respect: +60
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #98 on: February 27, 2014, 04:33:04 PM »
0
Cary is the man!

velociraptor

  • The Road of Trials
  • **
  • Posts: 75
  • Respect: +56
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #99 on: March 21, 2014, 08:59:00 AM »
+2
Jeff Goldblum, during a Reddit AMA, asked what directors he'd like to work with:

"Oh boy oh boy. Mmmm. Plenty. For starters, let's say Paul Thomas Anderson, and the Coen brothers."
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/20xynh/hi_this_is_jeff_goldblum_go_ahead_im_all_ears_ask/

Lottery

  • The Return Threshold
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
  • You're Dead!
  • Respect: +444
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #100 on: March 21, 2014, 09:05:21 AM »
0
Goldblum is such a perfectly Coen-y man.

modage

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 10761
  • Respect: +698
    • Floating Heads
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #101 on: March 21, 2014, 10:14:22 AM »
+5
Working with Wes but dreaming of Paul.

(Somebody banner that, plz.)
Christopher Nolan's directive was clear to everyone in the cast and crew: Use CGI only as a last resort.

Lottery

  • The Return Threshold
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
  • You're Dead!
  • Respect: +444
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #102 on: March 24, 2014, 07:51:07 PM »
+2
Jonathan Demme on Rachel Getting Married.

"So I had offered the part of Sidney to Paul Thomas Anderson, who is not an actor but is an adorable, enormously likable person, a friend of mine, and he had come to a table read of the script and he was great. And it was funny because Anne was at that table read and when it was over she said, ďThat guy Paul, heís good, isnít he?Ē and I go ďYou mean Paul Thomas Anderson?Ē and she goes, ďThat was Paul Thomas Anderson!?Ē It freaked her out! She goes, ďOh my god! Iím so glad I didnít know that!Ē I offered the part to Paul and he didnít want to do it, he was finishing up [There Will] Be Blood, and he didnít want to take a part in a movie."

http://www.goodprattle.com/2008/10/rachel-getting-married-director.html

EDIT: This is surely the sort of thing that's been posted before.

Pubrick

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 12170
  • Lynchian identity mystery
  • Respect: +769
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #103 on: March 24, 2014, 10:22:16 PM »
0
It hasn't.

Excellent find!

It confirms my suspicion that Anne Hathaway is a cinematic idiot.
endless 'nothing is what it seems'-isms

Lottery

  • The Return Threshold
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
  • You're Dead!
  • Respect: +444
Re: Other actors/directors/etc. who mention PTA
« Reply #104 on: April 15, 2014, 06:32:56 AM »
0

 

DMCA & Copyright | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy