Author Topic: INHERENT VICE (No Major Spoilers)  (Read 188160 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lottery

  • The Return Threshold
  • ****
  • Posts: 979
  • Respect: +470
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #180 on: May 06, 2013, 10:06:11 AM »
0
Yes, yes. I am so happy that Kevin J. O'Connor gets to work with PTA again.

Pubrick

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 12170
  • on the not-face of it
  • Respect: +781
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #181 on: May 06, 2013, 01:15:49 PM »
+3
the dude is now officially a motif.

brb, writing ten thousand words on his ten minutes of screen time.
under the paving stones.

Cloudy

  • The Meeting with the Goddess
  • ***
  • Posts: 376
  • Respect: +270
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #182 on: May 06, 2013, 02:08:35 PM »
0
Has anyone been curious about the quiet shift from Annapurna to Warner Bros? That's a huge deal.

modage

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 10832
  • Respect: +806
    • Floating Heads
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #183 on: May 06, 2013, 02:17:45 PM »
0
Has anyone been curious about the quiet shift from Annapurna to Warner Bros? That's a huge deal.
It's not really. I think AP wanted to make the movie but WB prob just made a better offer. Def no bad blood or anything.

Bigger question is: What's in this script (and/or who's in the cast) that made WB want to fork over the dough? Cause you know PTA still has final cut and approval over all the marketing. So with Joaquin in the lead, they must see something in this project that they can use to get people into theatres but having not read the book I have no idea what that might be.

The coolest part of this is that everyone thinking that post-'The Master' box office PTA will never be able to get anybody other than AP to finance his weird shit is immediately silenced by this news. WB stamp of approval = huge sign of confidence for the movie.
Christopher Nolan's directive was clear to everyone in the cast and crew: Use CGI only as a last resort.

Cloudy

  • The Meeting with the Goddess
  • ***
  • Posts: 376
  • Respect: +270
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #184 on: May 06, 2013, 04:50:06 PM »
0
I never was thinking bad blood either. Exactly, I'm more curious about how the project got Warner to take over. Should be a really tight script. I feel like when he recently named his favorite screenplays (pulp fiction, sweet smell of success, network, dr.strangelove...etc) there may have been something there. He could be hitting that sort of feel, but in his own trajectory.

Fernando

  • satan's little helper
  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2267
  • Respect: +246
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #185 on: May 06, 2013, 04:58:37 PM »
0
Has anyone been curious about the quiet shift from Annapurna to Warner Bros? That's a huge deal.
It's not really. I think AP wanted to make the movie but WB prob just made a better offer. Def no bad blood or anything.

I was wondering exactly the same, glad to hear that there's no bad blood about AP not producing Vice, one question...

so AP didn't have a signed deal to make Vice? I mean, did WB made the deal directly with PTA camp or did they bought it from AP?


Bigger question is: What's in this script (and/or who's in the cast) that made WB want to fork over the dough? Cause you know PTA still has final cut and approval over all the marketing.

I think WB finally realized that PTA is the one.

polkablues

  • Child of Myth
  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 7226
  • Respect: +1986
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #186 on: May 06, 2013, 06:02:34 PM »
0
I know we always think it's going to happen, but could this one actually be PTA's first taste of commercial success?

On the one hand, WB wouldn't have fought off Annapurna if they didn't think so. On the other hand, he's already flushed away a sizable chunk of box office by not casting RDJ in the lead.

There's only one man who can guarantee this film becomes the runaway hit that it deserves to be. And that man is Cheech Marin. (no offense to Kevin J. O'Connor)
First things first, I'm surrealist

md

  • The Ultimate Boon
  • ***
  • Posts: 474
  • Respect: +45
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #187 on: May 06, 2013, 06:43:53 PM »
+1
Boogie Nights was PTA's first 'big hit' in that it grossed tripled its budget (roughly 45mil on a 15mil budget) not including home video, which at the time of VHS and DVDs, was a huge profit margin.  It gave him leverage to make any movie he wanted and that film was Magnolia.  AP was probably turned by the Master underperforming.  Its the black sheep out of the bunch as its the only film AP has financed that hasn't made its money back, so on a business front it makes complete sense not to take the risk.

And yes!, Cheech would be a great addition as this film will play well as a 'serious' stoner comedy/drama/thriller.   
"look hard at what pleases you and even harder at what doesn't" ~ carolyn forche

Cloudy

  • The Meeting with the Goddess
  • ***
  • Posts: 376
  • Respect: +270
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #188 on: May 06, 2013, 08:35:15 PM »
0
[quote

I think WB finally realized that PTA is the one.
[/quote]

This could definitely be it.

Jeremy Blackman

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 11242
  • Respect: +1491
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #189 on: May 06, 2013, 08:55:51 PM »
0
I know we always think it's going to happen, but could this one actually be PTA's first taste of commercial success?

We were saying that before PDL, and it turned out to be his weirdest movie.

For those who have read the book, how much flexibility is there here? Is it likely to be near either end of the commercial/weird spectrum?
"Hunger is the purest sin"

Lottery

  • The Return Threshold
  • ****
  • Posts: 979
  • Respect: +470
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #190 on: May 06, 2013, 09:16:27 PM »
0
With anyone else, it could really go either way.

But I hope PTA squishes all the weird he can out of it.

Like I can imagine David Gordon Green's Inherent Vice (douchebag comedy David Gordon Green) without too much difficulty but really, it'll be hard to pin down where Paulo takes is.

Lottery

  • The Return Threshold
  • ****
  • Posts: 979
  • Respect: +470
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #191 on: May 06, 2013, 09:22:39 PM »
+2
Benicio Del Toro in talks to play...Sauncho, I guess.

Quote
Well, it looks like we aren't the only ones dropping "Inherent Vice" casting news today. The Wrap is reporting that Benicio Del Toro may be joining the film as well (though the studio has yet to confirm his involvement). According to the report Del Toro will be playing "an attorney who's always trying to help the protagonist out of trouble, though he's not an actual criminal lawyer. The character isn't a major role but is expected to be a potential scene-stealer" which would seem to indicate he'll be playing Doc's lawyer, Sauncho Smilax. His leading role in the underrated "Che" aside, it's been a while since we've seen Del Toro really tear into a really great role like his brilliant late 90s/early 00s streak ("Fear & Loathing In Las Vegas," "Traffic," "21 Grams," "The Usual Suspects," etc.), so this is definitely exciting news. Filming on 'Vice' is set to get underway later this month so there should be lots more casting announcements to come. And if you're involved with the production, why don't you drop us a line?

Cloudy

  • The Meeting with the Goddess
  • ***
  • Posts: 376
  • Respect: +270
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #192 on: May 06, 2013, 09:49:14 PM »
+1

Drenk

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1089
  • Respect: +598
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #193 on: May 07, 2013, 07:29:36 AM »
+1
Joaquin's comeback to Cannes this month will be with...this head... :yabbse-grin:




I'm so many people.

polkablues

  • Child of Myth
  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 7226
  • Respect: +1986
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #194 on: May 07, 2013, 04:29:41 PM »
0
He's got a little Danny McBride going on...
First things first, I'm surrealist

 

DMCA & Copyright | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy