www.ptanderson.info >> Shooting 65mm Without Elswit?

Started by bluejaytwist, July 18, 2005, 07:10:22 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bluejaytwist

cigarettes & red vines - pt anderson definitive resource
http://cigsandredvines.blogspot.com

fortyfps productions
http://www.fortyfps.com

bluejaytwist

Blog Update: Wonderful New Exclusive Interview with Michael "Jocco" Phillips. The man responsible for many things we knew about, related to Paul Thomas Anderson, and a few we didn't:

http://cigsandredvines.blogspot.com/2010/08/exclusive-interview-michael-jocco.html
cigarettes & red vines - pt anderson definitive resource
http://cigsandredvines.blogspot.com

fortyfps productions
http://www.fortyfps.com

matt35mm


bluejaytwist

new front page design is hidden in most recent update. a few things will be upgraded/added to, obviously links arent connected etc.
the full site (multimedia, articles & interviews, etc etc) will be 100% up before the new year. hope you enjoy it.

cjw
cigarettes & red vines - pt anderson definitive resource
http://cigsandredvines.blogspot.com

fortyfps productions
http://www.fortyfps.com

tpfkabi

I am Torgo. I take care of the place while the Master is away.

bluejaytwist

cigarettes & red vines - pt anderson definitive resource
http://cigsandredvines.blogspot.com

fortyfps productions
http://www.fortyfps.com

Stefen

No Elswit? Wow. I can't even imagine. Elswit is such a big part of PTA's look. I actually hope this isn't true.

As for shooting in 65mm, I'm a technical dumbass, so what does this mean? What was everything else of his shot in? I just hope he keeps the 2:35.1 aspect ratio. The look of his films is one of the top 3 things I love about his movies (along with the writing and casting).
Falling in love is the greatest joy in life. Followed closely by sneaking into a gated community late at night and firing a gun into the air.

P Heat

Crazy news. If this is true it's great hes trying to step it up a notch :yabbse-grin:

Quoteshowing PTA shooting tests and operating a 65mm camera used by Kubrick on 2001: A Space Odyssey ....

sorry for asking a stupid question but, does this mean that PTA is ACTUALLY using the same camera used by Kubrick nearly 50 years ago??

Also if so im pretty sure it's a 70mm camera and that the film negative is 65mm. Just reading what it says on the imdb page of 2001.
Quote from: Pubrick on September 11, 2012, 06:33:41 PM
anyway it was after i posted my first serious fanalysis. after the long post all he could say was that the main reason he wanted to see the master was cos of all the red heads.
:P

bluejaytwist

cigarettes & red vines - pt anderson definitive resource
http://cigsandredvines.blogspot.com

fortyfps productions
http://www.fortyfps.com

P Heat

Quote from: bluejaytwist on April 23, 2011, 01:59:42 PM
it is the actual camera yes!

fuckin AWESOME!!$#@!!!

guess that means he's testing for The Master most likely.  

Something unlikely is this..
Quotesuggests that perhaps Paul was inspired by Nolan/Pfister

inspired by Nolan? :ponder: 

think is safe to say its Kubrick and always has been.
Quote from: Pubrick on September 11, 2012, 06:33:41 PM
anyway it was after i posted my first serious fanalysis. after the long post all he could say was that the main reason he wanted to see the master was cos of all the red heads.
:P

Pubrick

Quote from: P Heat on April 23, 2011, 02:42:55 PM
Something unlikely is this..
Quotesuggests that perhaps Paul was inspired by Nolan/Pfister

inspired by Nolan? :ponder:  

think is safe to say its Kubrick and always has been.

Haha yeah the email tipster sounds like modage with that inspired by Nolan bit.. eff outta here with that ish.

Also good call by that commenter: shaved head = it's on!

Rest of the non speculative news is amazing and confirms his Kubrickian trajectory.
under the paving stones.

OrHowILearnedTo

Quote from: Stefen on April 23, 2011, 01:46:08 PM
As for shooting in 65mm, I'm a technical dumbass, so what does this mean? What was everything else of his shot in?

Someone can probably answer this more in depth, but basically you're shooting a larger image which gives you more information (and a higher quality image) and a shallower depth of field. It's great for those expansive, panoramic landscape shots cause you can keep expose it properly and keep a lot of the details in the image. As far as I know, shooting in 65/70 is only being used for imax stuff right now, so this is really exciting.

To my knowledge, everything else he's done has been shot on 35mm.

P Heat

any chance on the real photograph popping up soon??

Now I'm have thoughts of Paul being bald with minimal facial hair.....
Quote from: Pubrick on September 11, 2012, 06:33:41 PM
anyway it was after i posted my first serious fanalysis. after the long post all he could say was that the main reason he wanted to see the master was cos of all the red heads.
:P

72teeth

Quote from: Pubrick on April 23, 2011, 04:12:14 PM
Also good call by that commenter: shaved head = it's on!

thankth  :yabbse-grin:
and thanks to the artist for realizing just how important those shaved-head dots are
Doctor, Always Do the Right Thing.

Yowza Yowza Yowza

Stefen

Quote from: Pubrick on April 23, 2011, 04:12:14 PM
Quote from: P Heat on April 23, 2011, 02:42:55 PM
Something unlikely is this..
Quotesuggests that perhaps Paul was inspired by Nolan/Pfister

inspired by Nolan? :ponder:  

think is safe to say its Kubrick and always has been.

Haha yeah the email tipster sounds like modage with that inspired by Nolan bit.. eff outta here with that ish.

Also good call by that commenter: shaved head = it's on!

Rest of the non speculative news is amazing and confirms his Kubrickian trajectory.

haha, yeah, I didn't want to say it, but that Nolan bit was pure Modage.

PTA entering his Kubrick phase gives me a woody.
Falling in love is the greatest joy in life. Followed closely by sneaking into a gated community late at night and firing a gun into the air.