Author Topic: INHERENT VICE (No Major Spoilers)  (Read 148001 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BigSock

  • The Call to Adventure
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Respect: +11
Re: INHERENT VICE WITH ROBERT DOWNEY JR?
« Reply #75 on: February 01, 2013, 09:22:14 PM »
+6
With Charlize Theron reportedly working on that Seth MacFarlane western comedy that is slated to shoot around late spring/early summer, good chance she won't be in Inherent Vice after all...

Wonder who is going to end up doing the score? I know PTA's mentioned that he will work with Greenwood as long as Greenwood wants to work with him, but the material seems so much up Jon Brion's alley.

Also, with Annapurna financing, I wonder who'll distribute it. I don't think Weinstein will. It could have more mainstream appeal than anything PTA has done in quite some time, maybe Sony?

FYI: One of my 1st time posting! Exciting!  :yabbse-grin:

AntiDumbFrogQuestion

  • The Ultimate Boon
  • ***
  • Posts: 452
  • Respect: +45
Re: INHERENT VICE WITH ROBERT DOWNEY JR?
« Reply #76 on: February 04, 2013, 06:49:00 PM »
+1
Phillip Baker Hall as Mumbles O'Malley.

About damn time

modage

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 10749
  • Respect: +686
    • Floating Heads
Christopher Nolan's directive was clear to everyone in the cast and crew: Use CGI only as a last resort.

P Heat

  • The Vision Quest
  • **
  • Posts: 147
  • Respect: +12
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #78 on: February 10, 2013, 02:31:14 AM »
+1
Luis Guzman  said he is totally down with doing this film in a video interview a while back. Philip Baker or even Julianne Moore would be nice (yes they are old). Pynchon's voice is really good. I wouldn't be surprised if Paul uses that voice in something.

One more thing. Cheech & Chong (or at least Chong) would be awesome for this. lol I'd love to see that happen.
anyway it was after i posted my first serious fanalysis. after the long post all he could say was that the main reason he wanted to see the master was cos of all the red heads.
  :P

Frederico Fellini

  • The Vision Quest
  • **
  • Posts: 296
  • Respect: +171
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #79 on: February 12, 2013, 12:10:00 PM »
+2
I was reading this thing Pynchon did for David Foster Wallace after his death, and he speaks VERY BRIEFLY about INHERENT VICE:


" I have some vain hope that my latest, Inherent Vice, will be made into a movie, something, perhaps, along the lines of Altman’s The Long Goodbye, a kind of meta-detective film, maybe directed by the Coen brothers; there was some talk of Kubrick filming Gravity’s Rainbow back in the day, but that talk died with Stanley.) "   

Kubrick directing Gravity's rainbow?  Damn.



If you're a fan of Pynchon or Wllace, You can read the whole thing here: 

http://open.salon.com/blog/robert_brenner/2011/04/01/pale_kings_thomas_pynchon_on_david_foster_wallace
We fought against the day and we won... WE WON.

Cinema is something you do for a billion years... or not at all.

Drenk

  • The Magic Flight
  • ****
  • Posts: 630
  • Respect: +390
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #80 on: February 12, 2013, 12:37:12 PM »
+3
This text is a parody of Pynchon; Pynchon never wrote that. It loooked like a text of a person who really knew his Pynchon, and the confirmation is in the comments at the end.
I'm so many people.

Cloudy

  • The Meeting with the Goddess
  • ***
  • Posts: 367
  • Respect: +253
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #81 on: February 22, 2013, 01:35:08 AM »
0
Weird. Just finished the master and in the end credits I saw "Jackson Pynchon" as a production assistant.

polkablues

  • Child of Myth
  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 6923
  • Respect: +1634
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #82 on: February 22, 2013, 02:00:14 AM »
0
Quick internet search tells me that is indeed Thomas Pynchon's son's name.
Now you're in the *spoiler* place.

KLMNOP

  • The Call to Adventure
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Respect: +19
    • Ferdinand Center for the Creative
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #83 on: March 08, 2013, 02:27:41 AM »
+1
Seems like the script diverges quite a bit from the book.


polkablues

  • Child of Myth
  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 6923
  • Respect: +1634
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #84 on: March 08, 2013, 02:49:24 AM »
0
I haven't read the book.  Is it not "Knight Rider" slash-fiction?
Now you're in the *spoiler* place.

KLMNOP

  • The Call to Adventure
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Respect: +19
    • Ferdinand Center for the Creative
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #85 on: March 08, 2013, 04:57:34 AM »
0
Yeah, just disappointed that he changed the names of all my favorite characters.  :yabbse-sad:

KJ

  • The Magic Flight
  • ****
  • Posts: 633
  • Respect: +155
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #86 on: March 08, 2013, 09:01:02 AM »
0
That's not okay.

Sleepless

  • The Master of Three Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1723
  • I told you I would eat you
  • Respect: +267
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #87 on: March 08, 2013, 11:12:31 AM »
0
There's no way PTA wrote that. Or am I just stating the obvious here and everyone else is in on the joke?

polkablues

  • Child of Myth
  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 6923
  • Respect: +1634
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #88 on: March 08, 2013, 11:21:51 AM »
0
I can't be bothered to verify this, but I'm assuming it's from the "Unfinished Scripts" twitter account.
Now you're in the *spoiler* place.

KJ

  • The Magic Flight
  • ****
  • Posts: 633
  • Respect: +155
Re: INHERENT VICE
« Reply #89 on: March 08, 2013, 11:37:54 AM »
+1
It's actually a page from the Metal Gear Solid script.

 

DMCA & Copyright | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy