Author Topic: NYMPH()MANIAC  (Read 52474 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jeremy Blackman

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 10997
  • Respect: +1376
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #120 on: November 26, 2013, 02:23:35 PM »
0
Well... someone got that story very wrong.
"Hunger is the purest sin"

Tictacbk

  • The Magic Flight
  • ****
  • Posts: 673
  • Respect: +186
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #121 on: November 26, 2013, 07:06:16 PM »
0
They should release an edit that's just the 90 minutes cut for the "less explicit" version.

Jeremy Blackman

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 10997
  • Respect: +1376
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #122 on: November 26, 2013, 08:00:05 PM »
0
Why on earth should they do that?
"Hunger is the purest sin"

03

  • SBD
  • ***
  • Posts: 1701
  • positive energy;
  • Respect: +455
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #123 on: November 26, 2013, 08:57:38 PM »
+1
yeah don't tell them to do that!

matt35mm

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 3239
  • Bony old behind.
  • Respect: +492
    • My Films on Vimeo
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #124 on: November 26, 2013, 09:04:27 PM »
+1
They should release a 90 minute cut of just the super-explicit stuff, none of those dumb scenes of people talking.

Lottery

  • The Return Threshold
  • ****
  • Posts: 971
  • You're Dead!
  • Respect: +461
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #125 on: November 26, 2013, 09:35:25 PM »
0
They should release a 90 minute cut of just the super-explicit stuff, none of those dumb scenes of people talking.

Artistically legitimate hardcore porn is all I've ever wanted.

jenkins

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2419
  • Respect: +1461
    • Neon Burrito
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #126 on: November 26, 2013, 10:30:59 PM »
+1
no way, he's right, that's the right thing to do, and someone needed to say it!
this proposal could end the tyrannical dominance of sparknotes within written form and finally (finally!) bring it to cinematic form
for years and years cinema has carried the shame of having complete artistic representations, and the end must be insisted
we don't want to hear what you have to say
or how you want to say it, no
no!
we want to hear like a summary about each thing
explain it to us through a form which couldn't exist without the total
break the total into its pure beauty
in 90mins
or fuck off
fuck off pals
'cause we don't wanna hear your garbage
i think i forget how this joke is going
i think Tictacbk was also joking
since he put "less explicit" like that, with quotations
and it's true that cutting a long form into two long forms, even after saying there's some business aspect, is bullshit. what's explicit? lvt can't buy into it because he was serious the first time. but he has financial supporters and knows other people worry about it, so ok, he'll do it if you insist, but what's explicit? the whole thing. you can decide what to take out. lvt already took out what wasn't needed and included everything that was. he made his piece and it was 5 hours long. he's an artist. i'm so chill with that

it's dangerous to assume everything cut will be sexual. and it's awful(est) if everything that's chosen to be cut is chosen for being too sexual!

enter the void has a director's cut (the longer version) and a release cut. the released cut has a reel omitted. what i've heard is no decided, after sundance, to trim the movie by a reel. he approved, is what i've heard. and it's true the whole story works as complete as it can even with the reel missing. because the reel isn't necessary, as all it does it grow what's there without it, the movie might be better in its released cut. i've seen both of them many times, each time while they were in the theater, and it always felt to me like a heaven of cinema. obviously i preferred the longer. it was more of what i cherished

it's a popular tendency for a group of cinephiles to insist the shorter was better. apocalypse now for example. the weinstein company (oh my, yes) shortened the grandmaster for us release. there's the perception that the audience likes the movie shorter. another reason is it takes up less of your day. is that always true of the audience? i don't know. i don't care. give me the movie, all of it. a person like me, you coulda guessed, i'll take the whole piece

Ravi

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 4869
  • Respect: +90
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #127 on: November 27, 2013, 12:00:04 AM »
0
They should release a 90 minute cut of just the super-explicit stuff, none of those dumb scenes of people talking.

That's your solution to everything.

Tictacbk

  • The Magic Flight
  • ****
  • Posts: 673
  • Respect: +186
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #128 on: November 27, 2013, 04:37:13 PM »
0
They should release a 90 minute cut of just the super-explicit stuff, none of those dumb scenes of people talking.

Isn't that what I said?


But for real, if you can cut 90 minutes of footage and all it does is make the film "less explicit," you can probably cut some of those minutes all together.

MacGuffin

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 22985
  • Respect: +640
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #129 on: November 27, 2013, 06:52:56 PM »
+2
Cut Shia's scenes.
Don't think about making art, just get it done. Let everyone else decide if it's good or bad, whether they love it or hate it. While they are deciding, make even more art. - Andy Warhol


Skeleton FilmWorks

matt35mm

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 3239
  • Bony old behind.
  • Respect: +492
    • My Films on Vimeo
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #130 on: November 28, 2013, 02:01:34 PM »
0
They should release a 90 minute cut of just the super-explicit stuff, none of those dumb scenes of people talking.

That's your solution to everything.

No, my solution to everything is to move under the sea.

They should release a 90 minute cut of just the super-explicit stuff, none of those dumb scenes of people talking.

Isn't that what I said?


But for real, if you can cut 90 minutes of footage and all it does is make the film "less explicit," you can probably cut some of those minutes all together.

I misunderstood; I thought you meant they should do a 90 min un-explicit cut of the movie because I mis-read you as saying "a 90 minute cut" instead of "the 90 minutes [that were] cut" but I see now what you were saying. Oops.

jenkins

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2419
  • Respect: +1461
    • Neon Burrito
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #131 on: November 28, 2013, 02:33:38 PM »
0
i wasn't completely sure and entirely misunderstood as well. i'd watch that. that'll already exist

while thinking of it the other way i thought i'd see it if it was like a Giorgio Moroder version of NYMPH()MANIAC. i'd watch that also probably, but we'd need a Giorgio Moroder

Pubrick

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 12170
  • on the not-face of it
  • Respect: +775
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #132 on: November 28, 2013, 02:36:46 PM »
+2
They should cut 90mins out of this thread.
under the paving stones.

jenkins

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2419
  • Respect: +1461
    • Neon Burrito
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #133 on: November 28, 2013, 02:44:54 PM »
0
they is you, and you just did it! good biz work

there's a secret portion from earlier where i discuss my overall excitement for the full release. dead precedents can represent me: von stroheim's greed (the most famous of all?), apocalypse now, enter the void, various forms of metropolis. i added greed and have mentioned the others. i also think of the whole bloody affair and kill bill -- i've been waiting since kill bill was in the theater to see kill bill again, because i've been waiting for the whole bloody affair. it's played here but i couldn't go. it's like qt is telling me to take it in whatever form i can, it doesn't matter very much. is he saying that? callers, what do you think

Drenk

  • The Return Threshold
  • ****
  • Posts: 925
  • Respect: +519
Re: NYMPH()MANIAC
« Reply #134 on: November 29, 2013, 02:05:22 PM »
0
Duck ----> Vagina.

http://vimeo.com/80495668
I'm so many people.

 

DMCA & Copyright | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy