Unrated Edition: With Footage Too Sexy For Theatres!

Started by modage, November 18, 2003, 02:13:21 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4
User actions

ᾦɐļᵲʊʂ

#15
November 18, 2003, 09:37:04 PM
What's out of the Requiem For A Dream's Non-Director Cut?  I only bought the Director's cut because what's the point of losing key imagery?  I had actually blind bought it, and figured I'd go for the gusto.

Boy did I score a big one.
"As a matter of fact I only work with the feeling of something magical, something seemingly significant. And to keep it magical I don't want to know the story involved, I just want the hypnotic effect of it somehow seeming significant without knowing why." - Len Lye

Alethia

#17
November 18, 2003, 10:30:59 PM
that wasn't really warranted, but i saw a semi-opportunity and figured id take it

Recce

#18
November 19, 2003, 04:23:32 PM
LOL, wasn't 'In the Cut' released in theatres a few weeks ago? Guess it sucked.
"The idea had been growing in my brain for some time: TRUE force. All the king's men
                        cannot put it back together again." (Travis Bickle, "Taxi Driver")

tpfkabi

#19
November 19, 2003, 08:02:20 PM
did anyone see Killing Me Softly? is it pretty much like a B sex movie thriller starring Heaher G
I am Torgo. I take care of the place while the Master is away.

aclockworkjj

#20
November 24, 2003, 12:12:40 PM
Quote from: themodernage02killing me softly
jeez, this thread made me rent this.  has to be probably the worst movie i have seen in a long time.  not even heather graham could save this.  the cheesiest in all areas.  honestly, i don't even know how this piece of crap got made.

Weak2ndAct

#21
November 24, 2003, 01:28:41 PM
Quote from: aclockworkjj
Quote from: themodernage02killing me softly
honestly, i don't even know how this piece of crap got made.
Heather Graham naked, and plenty of sex scenes maybe?

modage

#22
November 24, 2003, 01:37:08 PM
Quote from: aclockworkjj
Quote from: themodernage02killing me softly
jeez, this thread made me rent this.  has to be probably the worst movie i have seen in a long time.  not even heather graham could save this.  the cheesiest in all areas.  honestly, i don't even know how this piece of crap got made.

oh god.... i set out to do good, but it somehow turned to evil....  :shock:
Christopher Nolan's directive was clear to everyone in the cast and crew: Use CGI only as a last resort.

freakerdude

#23
November 24, 2003, 01:57:49 PM
We all know what's happening with the release of these so called unrated versions......it's opening another devil's portal to porn! Well, at least they want us to think we might get a sneak peek.

Speaking of Heather G., I love that full frontal in BN. Thank the tech wiz's for the DVD frame by frame slow mo with repeat markers.
MC Pee Pants

aclockworkjj

#24
November 24, 2003, 06:54:22 PM
Quote from: Weak2ndActHeather Graham naked
oh...don't get me wrong, that part was nice...but no boogie nights.

this movie was seriously fuckin' crap...it was so bad, i am almost pissed I sat through it and didn't just watch the sex scenes.  my advice, the new dvd release.."the jj cut", where i cut out the 79 min. of garbage and just show the extended versions of the sex scenes.  but replace joe fiennes, cause he is sorta lame...get this, he plays a philisophical mountain climber, with a mysterious past...shit, I can't even get into it.  it was seriously that stupid, complete with a great incest twist too....

freakerdude

#25
November 24, 2003, 11:02:33 PM
I am currently addicted to it......Boogie Nights that is.
MC Pee Pants

modage

#26
February 01, 2004, 05:01:47 PM
Title: Wild Things: Unrated Edition!
Released: 20th April 2004
SRP: $19.95

Further Details
Those good chaps at DVDDebate.com have posted the artwork for the unrated edition of Wild Things which stars Denise Richards, Neve Campbell, Matt Dillon and Kevin Bacon. The disc will be available to own from the 20th April this year and should set you back somewhere in the region of $19.95. I'm afraid that full disc specs are still not available for this once, although we can now reveal that the disc will include around seven minutes of unseen footage.
Christopher Nolan's directive was clear to everyone in the cast and crew: Use CGI only as a last resort.

SoNowThen

#27
February 02, 2004, 09:23:04 AM
...hopefully 7 extra minutes of naked Denise Richards.



Hey, btw, did anyone else think Bill Murray was much better in this than in LIT? Oh, just me? Oh well, I do...
Those who say that the totalitarian state of the Soviet Union was not "real" Marxism also cannot admit that one simple feature of Marxism makes totalitarianism necessary:  the rejection of civil society. Since civil society is the sphere of private activity, its abolition and replacement by political society means that nothing private remains. That is already the essence of totalitarianism; and the moralistic practice of the trendy Left, which regards everything as political and sometimes reveals its hostility to free speech, does nothing to contradict this implication.

When those who hated capital and consumption (and Jews) in the 20th century murdered some hundred million people, and the poster children for the struggle against international capitalism and America are now fanatical Islamic terrorists, this puts recent enthusiasts in an awkward position. Most of them are too dense and shameless to appreciate it, and far too many are taken in by the moralistic and paternalistic rhetoric of the Left.

ShanghaiOrange

#28
February 02, 2004, 11:52:54 AM
Bill Murray is better than himself in any movie he does.
Last five films (theater)
-The Da Vinci Code: *
-Thank You For Smoking: ***
-Silent Hill: ***1/2 (high)
-Happy Together: ***1/2
-Slither: **

Last five films (video)
-Solaris: ***1/2
-Cobra Verde: ***1/2
-My Best Fiend: **1/2
-Days of Heaven: ****
-The Thin Red Line: ***

SoNowThen

#29
February 02, 2004, 11:59:33 AM
Quote from: ShanghaiOrangeBill Murray is better than himself in any movie he does.

:-D  I can't argue with that logic.
Those who say that the totalitarian state of the Soviet Union was not "real" Marxism also cannot admit that one simple feature of Marxism makes totalitarianism necessary:  the rejection of civil society. Since civil society is the sphere of private activity, its abolition and replacement by political society means that nothing private remains. That is already the essence of totalitarianism; and the moralistic practice of the trendy Left, which regards everything as political and sometimes reveals its hostility to free speech, does nothing to contradict this implication.

When those who hated capital and consumption (and Jews) in the 20th century murdered some hundred million people, and the poster children for the struggle against international capitalism and America are now fanatical Islamic terrorists, this puts recent enthusiasts in an awkward position. Most of them are too dense and shameless to appreciate it, and far too many are taken in by the moralistic and paternalistic rhetoric of the Left.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4
User actions