Glass

Started by Jeremy Blackman, January 09, 2019, 04:32:38 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jeremy Blackman




This is M. Night Shyamalan's followup to Unbreakable and Split.

Reviews thusfar are not great.

Chris Evangelista says: "Editing is the real villain of Glass. Unbreakable was tight and enthralling. Sure, it moved at a slow, reserved pace, but there was life burning in that unhurried momentum. Glass is lost in seemingly endless scenes that clobber the viewer over the head with the same info again, and again, and again."

Yes

Yeah this is not good and that review is a great example why

It's just so talky and flabby. It's not much of a film as it is an uneven thesis. Scenes don't flow and transition. The editing lacks a heartbeat and pulse.

There's shockingly no energy. Like Willis, the whole thing is just lethargic

Unsure what M. Night is even attempting to achieve here? There's lots of exposition about how comic books are not history but the message felt murky.