Author Topic: Roger Ebert  (Read 65513 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sleuth

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 3468
  • dead comic genius
  • Respect: +8
    • http://www.conologue.com
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #45 on: May 23, 2004, 07:50:46 PM »
0
Even his voice changed
I like to hug dogs

picolas

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 1752
  • Respect: +105
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #46 on: May 23, 2004, 07:53:22 PM »
0
Whatever happened to the rumour he was killed in a motorcycle accident and Roeper replaced him shortly after the Ebert look-alike competition and that's why they never go on tour anymore?

MacGuffin

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 22985
  • Respect: +641
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #47 on: May 23, 2004, 07:59:45 PM »
0
Quote from: Sleuth
Even his voice changed


Some people are just late bloomers.
“Don't think about making art, just get it done. Let everyone else decide if it's good or bad, whether they love it or hate it. While they are deciding, make even more art.” - Andy Warhol


Skeleton FilmWorks

Chest Rockwell

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1596
  • Respect: 0
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #48 on: May 23, 2004, 11:54:11 PM »
0
He's lost some 87 pounds.

pete

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 5555
  • freakin huge
  • Respect: +453
    • my site
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #49 on: May 24, 2004, 12:22:11 AM »
0
he looks like an old harry potter.
“Tragedy is a close-up; comedy, a long shot.”
- Buster Keaton

Pubrick

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 12170
  • on the not-face of it
  • Respect: +781
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #50 on: May 24, 2004, 06:59:07 AM »
0
he still looks like he's melting.
under the paving stones.

Just Withnail

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1662
  • Respect: +496
    • Truls Krane Meby's website
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #51 on: May 24, 2004, 07:15:31 AM »
0
That pic must be posted in the caption thread.

The Silver Bullet

  • The Ultimate Boon
  • ***
  • Posts: 585
  • Respect: 0
    • http://esotericrabbit.blogspot.com
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #52 on: May 26, 2004, 09:52:00 AM »
0
God, he doesn't look like he's melting; he looks like he's damned near dying...

:?
RABBIT n. pl. rab·bits or rabbit[list=1]
  • Any of various long-eared, short-tailed, burrowing mammals of the family Leporidae.
  • A hare.
  • [/list:o][/size]

ono

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 4293
  • ...
  • Respect: +233
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #53 on: May 26, 2004, 12:56:00 PM »
0
He DID have an operation to have his thyroid gland removed a while back, you know.  I think he had some paralysis in his cheek which caused it to look like that.  So like, give the guy a break or something.

Myxo

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 1768
  • Respect: +29
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #54 on: May 26, 2004, 02:40:30 PM »
0
"Somebody feed me!"

hedwig

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2144
  • Lazy bones ain't got no time to waste away
  • Respect: +2
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #55 on: June 15, 2004, 05:00:49 AM »
0
changed my mind.

Pubrick

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 12170
  • on the not-face of it
  • Respect: +781
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #56 on: June 15, 2004, 05:21:17 AM »
0
i don't care much for Girl 6, so, i dunno what to tell ya. Beyond the Valley of the Dolls, however, is quite alright by me.

i never went to ebert for black-feminist-cultural sophistication, didn't know that was a requirement for film critics. sumtimes he doesn't know what he's talking about, his star system sucks, and his commentaries are great.. that much i know.
under the paving stones.

grand theft sparrow

  • The Master of Two Worlds
  • *****
  • Posts: 2038
  • NO SLEEP TIL BROKER!
  • Respect: +7
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #57 on: June 15, 2004, 12:45:50 PM »
0
Roger Ebert lost what little credibility he had left when he wrote these words:

"Is 'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban' as good as the first two films? Not quite."

©brad

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 4559
  • Respect: +254
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #58 on: June 15, 2004, 02:54:30 PM »
0
whats wrong with that?

whatever. ebert is good.

modage

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 10832
  • Respect: +806
    • Floating Heads
Re: Roger Ebert - INVALIDATED ..again
« Reply #59 on: June 15, 2004, 10:19:23 PM »
0
Quote from: hacksparrow
Roger Ebert lost what little credibility he had left when he wrote these words:

"Is 'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban' as good as the first two films? Not quite."

yeah, whats wrong with that?  he doesnt feel the need to automatically judge 3 as better because it was directed by someone with credibility like a lot of other people.  it SEEMS like it should be better because it has a better director, and has some better camerawork, acting and more adult themes but its still a bit of a mess of storytelling.  why cant the first two be better?
Christopher Nolan's directive was clear to everyone in the cast and crew: Use CGI only as a last resort.

 

DMCA & Copyright | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy