Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
Paul Thomas Anderson / Re: Everything twitter
« Last post by wilberfan on October 10, 2018, 12:10:45 AM »
Bill Simmons just tweeted this about his newest episode:

For the night owls... a brand-new BS Podcast featuring an NBA MVP discussion with @ryenarussillo and @KevinOConnorNBA, then a wide-ranging interview with the great John C. Reilly. (Gee I wonder if Boogie Nights came up.)

https://twitter.com/BillSimmons/status/1049887525194686466


"...Bill sits down with actor John C. Reilly to discuss his journey from the south side of Chicago to the silver screen. Then they talk about working with the great Paul Thomas Anderson, 'Step Brothers', 'Boogie Nights', Reilly's new film 'The Sisters Brothers', and more (32:30)."
62
Paul Thomas Anderson / Re: Untitled PTA Project (2020)
« Last post by jenkins on October 10, 2018, 12:06:38 AM »
the quote is from "One insider familiar with Annapurna’s operations" who remains unnamed. it's a spin article.

Quote
Two of Barnard’s top projects have fallen apart, Variety reported on Tuesday prior to her exit. One was a high-profile telling of Roger Ailes’ Fox News implosion starring Nicole Kidman and Charlize Theron. The other was the Jennifer Lopez drama “The Hustlers at Scores,” about exotic dancers who turn the tables on their Wall Street clients after the economy tanks.
variety

to spin it another way, i don't think were was a mutual agreement with the president about how to use money. it's not PTA fan crazy to say that within the reevaluation period he'll be deemed of value. he's already Tiffany Haddishing it, and though Adam Sandler didn't bring the bank you know i mean he's doing something, and he's def got clout
63
Paul Thomas Anderson / Re: Untitled PTA Project (2020)
« Last post by wilberfan on October 09, 2018, 11:37:37 PM »
Quote
The Western drama “The Sisters Brothers,” starring John C. Reilly and Joaquin Phoenix, was released last month and has so far taken in just $730,000, according to boxofficemojo.com. A knowledgeable individual said the film cost $38 million to produce and Annapurna paid a significant fraction of that for the U.S. rights, not including marketing costs.

The studio’s anticipated December release “Vice,” about Dick Cheney, cost a bloated $60 million to produce. Knowledgeable sources said the movie should have been made for half that amount. The studio declined to comment on the budget.

“There is a financial issue going on,” an individual with knowledge of the studio told TheWrap. “Her dad has put a lot of money into the company and I don’t think he wants to support her behavior and what’s been going on. There are restraints — the money is not flowing.”

On Tuesday, the company abruptly unloaded a star-studded Jay Roach movie about Fox News founder Roger Ailes and that was three weeks away from starting production, as well as Jennifer Lopez’s “The Hustlers at Scores,” the latter picked up by STX Films.

An insider told TheWrap that there were budget issues involving the Roger Ailes film, but another individual with knowledge of the project said that the company had approved a $35 million budget just one week ago. The film, which Canadian-based Bron Studios is expected to co-finance, will star John Lithgow as Ailes as well as Charlize Theron and Margot Robbie.

One insider familiar with Annapurna’s operations said that Ellison is focused on making passion projects without regard to the cost.

“She makes bad decisions,” the individual said. “She wanted to chase all these expensive movies that weren’t going to make money, and she said, ‘I don’t care whether they make money.’ That’s not how you run a company.”
Source
64
Paul Thomas Anderson / Re: Untitled PTA Project (2020)
« Last post by Jeremy Blackman on October 09, 2018, 11:35:29 PM »
I didn't think it was conceived as a moneymaking enterprise, though.
65
Paul Thomas Anderson / Re: Untitled PTA Project (2020)
« Last post by BigSock on October 09, 2018, 11:32:19 PM »
There is still genuine concern for worry with Annapurna. The president leaving is big news. They really only have 1 success as a distributor: Sorry To Bother You. Sisters Brothers might not even cross 1m at the box office.
66
Paul Thomas Anderson / Re: Untitled PTA Project (2020)
« Last post by jenkins on October 09, 2018, 10:50:30 PM »
this entire situation is entirely unrelated to PTA in every capacity. the two films were dropped because they were projects of the president who left.
67
Paul Thomas Anderson / Re: Untitled PTA Project (2020)
« Last post by BigSock on October 09, 2018, 09:16:38 PM »
I think Annapurna still promised the financing for PTA. Whether some other studio ends up distributing remains to be seen like how Phantom Thread went down. Annapurna has certainly collected major Ls and are going through some behind the scenes turmoil, but Ellison already has a relationship with PTA after Master and Phantom Thread. She doesn't want to be the one turning down PTA. It's easier to drop those projects and keep the funding secure for PTA. Hopefully that happens sooner rather than later
68
The Small Screen / Re: Maniac
« Last post by BB on October 09, 2018, 07:54:12 PM »
Given that process, it's even more bizarre to me that this is what they turned out. I find it both boring and utterly nonsensical. This was genetically engineered to appeal to viewers? It plays like quirky 2000s indie madlibs. PDL and Eternal Sunshine, yes. But also Garden State, Donnie Darko, I Heart Huckabees, mumblecore, Tiny Furniture, all this shit I thought people hated. Then divorced from anything resembling human behaviour, conventional plotting, or experiential reality. At a glance, folks seem to be enjoying it too. Color me baffled, y'all.
69
Paul Thomas Anderson / Re: Untitled PTA Project (2020)
« Last post by WorldForgot on October 09, 2018, 07:28:59 PM »
Interesting to note Annapurna's troubles that are going on. They cancelled two films and the head of production got let go. Sounds like restructuring or financial troubles to me. Considering how much Annapurna has helped Anderson this doesn't bode well for whenever he thinks up a new film.

Dunno how these decisions are ultimately made, obvi, but Sorry to Bother You had been their bank this year with $17.4M and last year PT made $21m dom, $45mil ww, seated as their 7th highest film in both categories. So, idk. Whoever comes in better not be no dummy like me.
70
The Small Screen / Re: Maniac
« Last post by polkablues on October 09, 2018, 07:16:36 PM »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
DMCA & Copyright | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy