Xixax Film Forum

The Director's Chair => Quentin Tarantino => Topic started by: prophet on May 16, 2004, 05:28:55 PM

Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: prophet on May 16, 2004, 05:28:55 PM
we dont see whats in the suitcase. i think that hes saving it for a PF2 so if he ever becomes a hack or doesnt produce good films anymore he can always do a pulp fiction 2 and get his name out there again. this is my own stupid thory i though of while i was in the shower. can someone comment?
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: RegularKarate on May 16, 2004, 06:28:05 PM
I'll comment.














no
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: prophet on May 16, 2004, 07:16:02 PM
thanks for the








comment .

anymore well though out comments?
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: Alethia on May 16, 2004, 07:37:51 PM
i think ur wrong.
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: prophet on May 16, 2004, 07:44:02 PM
ok 2 vs 1 lets see some more opinions.
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: cron on May 16, 2004, 07:44:42 PM
i think my shower thoughts are cooler  :)
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: Sleuth on May 16, 2004, 08:44:03 PM
i agree, cronopio's shower thoughts are great
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: prophet on May 16, 2004, 08:52:12 PM
yeah me too i spyed on him once.
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: pete on May 16, 2004, 08:59:15 PM
it's so simple; it's marcellus's ass in the suitcase.
think about it.  that's why the hicks picked him first (you really think they'd eenie meenie TWO people?) 'cause he's got the most beautiful ass (remember? "it's the most beautiful thing I've seen).  and you never got to see a shot of his ass until the next day when it was recovered.
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: Alethia on May 16, 2004, 09:12:50 PM
ding ding!!!  we have a winner...
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: The Perineum Falcon on May 16, 2004, 09:44:03 PM
Shower thoughts should stay in the shower.
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: Ravi on May 16, 2004, 11:53:58 PM
No point discussing it.  Let's move on!
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: prophet on May 17, 2004, 12:05:19 AM
i agree 100%
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: picolas on May 17, 2004, 12:07:54 AM
2 vs 5
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: pete on May 20, 2004, 03:02:05 AM
Quote from: ranemaka13Shower thoughts should stay in the shower.

no way dude.

"SOMETIMES TWINS YOU SEE IN THE STREET ARE JUST SINGULAR PEOPLE COUPLED WITH YOUR OWN DAMN DEJA VU."

"PEOPLE ONLY LIKE KITTENS BECAUSE THEY TREAT PEOPLE LIKE SHIT, KINDA LIKE THEIR BASTARD BOYFRIENDS/GIRLFRIENDS."

"MENSTRATION IS DIRTY."

"LIFE IS BULLSHIT MAN."
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: Alethia on May 20, 2004, 07:45:40 AM
i love you.
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: ElPandaRoyal on May 20, 2004, 08:26:43 AM
But get a room so you can love each other in peace.
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: El Duderino on May 20, 2004, 06:25:51 PM
that theory is stupid, you should be ashamed for creating an entire thread dedicated to it


:wink:
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: El Scorchoz on May 21, 2004, 12:41:56 AM
I thought it was Marsellus's soul in the suitcase.
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: Jeremy Blackman on May 21, 2004, 12:43:19 AM
MacGuffin.
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: picolas on May 21, 2004, 01:10:47 AM
http://xixax.com/viewtopic.php?t=1733http://xixax.com/viewtopic.php?t=1733http://xixax.com/viewtopic.php?t=1733http://xixax.com/viewtopic.php?t=1733http://xixax.com/viewtopic.php?t=1733http://xixax.com/viewtopic.php?t=1733http://xixax.com/viewtopic.php?t=1733http://xixax.com/viewtopic.php?t=1733http://xixax.com/viewtopic.php?t=1733http://xixax.com/viewtopic.php?t=1733http://xixax.com/viewtopic.php?t=1733http://xixax.com/viewtopic.php?t=1733http://xixax.com/viewtopic.php?t=1733http://xixax.com/viewtopic.php?t=1733

hey it works!!111
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: jasper_window on May 21, 2004, 12:21:28 PM
Quote from: El ScorchozI thought it was Marsellus's soul in the suitcase.

It is.  Ebert did a 3 or 4 day viewing with a film class in colorado, and that's what they came up with.  Wallace has the band aid on the back of his head, which is where you're soul is taken from.  The soul is supposed to be the most beautiful thing anyone has seen (travolta is mesmorized by it).  The combo on the briefcase is 666, suggesting Wallace is the devil, lost his soul (in a briefcase of course, where else would it be?) and wants it back.  Now how 3 stupid, wimpy looking nerds got a hold of it is another question entirely.
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: Pubrick on May 21, 2004, 12:32:40 PM
Quote from: jasper_window Now how 3 stupid, wimpy looking nerds got a hold of it is another question entirely
...and hopefully not one that will be asked a million times a day for 10 years straight.
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: jasper_window on May 21, 2004, 12:41:38 PM
Quote from: Pubrick
Quote from: jasper_window Now how 3 stupid, wimpy looking nerds got a hold of it is another question entirely
...and hopefully not one that will be asked a million times a day for 10 years straight.

hopefully not
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: modage on May 21, 2004, 11:30:27 PM
Quote from: jasper_window
Quote from: El ScorchozI thought it was Marsellus's soul in the suitcase.

It is.  Ebert did a 3 or 4 day viewing with a film class in colorado, and that's what they came up with.  Wallace has the band aid on the back of his head, which is where you're soul is taken from.  The soul is supposed to be the most beautiful thing anyone has seen (travolta is mesmorized by it).  The combo on the briefcase is 666, suggesting Wallace is the devil, lost his soul (in a briefcase of course, where else would it be?) and wants it back.  Now how 3 stupid, wimpy looking nerds got a hold of it is another question entirely.
yeah but somewhere they said the bandaid was just to cover up something on his neck.  the 666 was probably just cause he thought it'd add mystery and so was the glow because even he didnt know what the hell was in it.  but like, they said its really a macguffin and not the point.  (although fun to argue and debate over even 10 years later), thats still my favorite theory.  but i think QT has stated it was not his intent.
Title: my meaning less theory on why ......
Post by: brockly on May 22, 2004, 12:43:01 AM
from imdb:

Tarantino has said that the band-aid on the back of Marsellus Wallace's neck had nothing to do with an allusion to the Devil stealing Marsellus's soul... but that the actor Ving Rhames had a scar on the back of his neck he wanted to cover up.